Whiner's Woad Whining, swan dives and other inappropiate topics get moved here. |
|
In Reply to: You probably think 'ain't' is a word, too... posted by mkuller on May 15, 2007 at 11:13:21:
That DOESN'T make it right.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - See Ron Welborne and John Curl Crash and Burn - Soundripples 09:13:58 05/14/07 (107)
- Wrong - Brian Walsh 10:36:48 05/14/07 (15)
- "john curl - Manufacturer, Parasound, CTC" - Is somebody a LIAR, besides being cranky? N/T - carcass93 14:33:25 05/16/07 (4)
- Are you really that ignorant? [nt] - Ted Smith 17:29:48 05/16/07 (3)
- Yeah, I guess... In the sense I wouldn't know what's the pleasure... - carcass93 08:51:17 05/17/07 (2)
- He didn't claim to be a Parasound Manufacturer... - Ted Smith 10:07:37 05/17/07 (1)
- That was formulated as question - and you gave negative answer. That's fine. N/T - carcass93 11:29:16 05/17/07 (0)
- Try reading John's posts - Soundripples 10:54:10 05/14/07 (2)
- That Moniker...... - Todd Krieger 19:14:55 05/14/07 (1)
- Do you think it's a word or not a word? (sub-thread).... nt - TomLarson 19:17:01 05/14/07 (0)
- Re: Wrong - clio09 11:08:50 05/14/07 (6)
- Walk a mile my friend.... - *Michael Z* 11:23:26 05/14/07 (1)
- Welborne pick up the phone....yea right - Soundripples 12:20:08 05/14/07 (0)
- John Curl ... - lipmanl 11:28:18 05/14/07 (2)
- I would love to hear... - SF tech 23:25:03 05/14/07 (1)
- See Tube/DIY Asylum (nt) - lipmanl 06:30:45 05/15/07 (0)
- why do you feel the overwhelming need to repeat this thread? - dave c 11:50:56 05/14/07 (2)
- You are right. - Soundripples 12:22:32 05/14/07 (1)
- It's good to let the public know about problems with a vendor... - Wellfed 12:32:41 05/14/07 (0)
- I've read it... - kuma 13:14:39 05/14/07 (0)
- Done and dusted. Let bygones be bygones and move on. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:18:17 05/14/07 (0)
- This thread should be deleted! So JC may have messed up, so what, the OP is still an idiot for rehashing here. nt - bjh 13:23:52 05/14/07 (0)
- John is a great guy... - mkuller 13:43:23 05/14/07 (60)
- Re: John is a great guy... - Len_ 17:11:14 05/14/07 (59)
- John Curl... - mkuller 17:33:07 05/14/07 (58)
- Re: John Curl... - Len_ 18:29:56 05/14/07 (11)
- Re: John Curl... - Brian Walsh 18:55:50 05/14/07 (3)
- Re: John Curl... - Len_ 19:09:33 05/14/07 (1)
- It was merely... - mkuller 11:16:50 05/15/07 (0)
- Re: John Curl... - TomLarson 19:14:55 05/14/07 (0)
- What's offensive, Len, is your use of the word "asshole". - vacuous 19:41:26 05/14/07 (6)
- Re: What's offensive, Len, is your use of the word "asshole". - Thergit 05:14:58 06/17/07 (0)
- Re: What's offensive, Len, is your use of the word "asshole". - Len_ 20:33:40 05/14/07 (4)
- Obviously, you've never read AA posting rules. - vacuous 20:45:26 05/14/07 (3)
- Re: Obviously, you've never read AA posting rules. - Len_ 20:55:06 05/14/07 (2)
- Re: Obviously, you've never read AA posting rules. - john curl 23:18:51 05/14/07 (1)
- Re: Obviously, you've never read AA posting rules. - Len_ 00:22:48 05/15/07 (0)
- If "irregardless" is not a word, what is it??? nt - TomLarson 19:11:32 05/14/07 (26)
- Re: If "irregardless" is not a word, what is it??? nt - Len_ 19:13:10 05/14/07 (6)
- "Classically accepted" is certainly an interesting concept given that language changes over time nt - TomLarson 19:18:12 05/14/07 (3)
- Re: "Classically accepted" is certainly an interesting concept given that language changes over time nt - Len_ 19:24:18 05/14/07 (2)
- Re: "Classically accepted" is certainly an interesting concept given that language changes over time nt - TomLarson 19:33:56 05/14/07 (1)
- Irregardless is a nonsense word - Thergit 04:58:32 06/17/07 (0)
- Re: irregardless - Jackaro 20:10:33 05/14/07 (1)
- Re: irregardless - TomLarson 11:38:27 05/15/07 (0)
- Poor useof - kavakidd 21:59:48 05/14/07 (11)
- Re: Poor useof--huh,,, well what's "useof" ????? nt - TomLarson 11:37:16 05/15/07 (10)
- Re: Poor useof--huh,,, well what's "useof" ????? nt - kavakidd 11:38:42 05/15/07 (9)
- Re: Poor useof--huh,,, well what's "useof" ????? nt - TomLarson 18:05:41 05/15/07 (8)
- Quite simple - kavakidd 19:29:39 05/15/07 (7)
- Re: Quite simple - Brian Walsh 20:00:29 05/15/07 (2)
- Re: Quite simple - TomLarson 21:28:15 05/15/07 (3)
- Re: Quite simple - Thergit 05:06:14 06/17/07 (0)
- Re: Quite simple - kavakidd 22:04:54 05/15/07 (1)
- LOL.....nt - TomLarson 22:24:56 05/15/07 (0)
- A "word" not used by those with taste. nt - markrohr 09:35:46 05/15/07 (6)
- Oh that's informative for sure.... nt - TomLarson 11:36:38 05/15/07 (5)
- Okay. - markrohr 12:25:41 05/15/07 (4)
- Re: Okay. - Thergit 05:12:21 06/17/07 (0)
- Take an introduction to Linguistics course sometime..... - TomLarson 13:05:54 05/15/07 (2)
- What, another one? nt - markrohr 14:39:04 05/15/07 (1)
- Re: What, another one? nt - TomLarson 18:12:52 05/15/07 (0)
- 'irregardless' is indeed a word - Green Lantern 21:42:09 05/14/07 (18)
- Re: 'irregardless' is indeed a word - thetubeguy1954 07:12:07 05/15/07 (15)
- Modern English is a constant, evolving language comprised from MANY origins.. - Green Lantern 09:43:35 05/15/07 (14)
- You probably think 'ain't' is a word, too... - mkuller 11:13:21 05/15/07 (13)
- Re: You probably think 'ain't' is a word, too... - TomLarson 11:35:35 05/15/07 (8)
- Maybe you should ask your English teacher...(nt) - mkuller 11:37:24 05/15/07 (7)
- It's too late. nt - markrohr 12:27:41 05/15/07 (6)
- Irregardless, language changes...if you don't believe me, google it and text message me nt.... - TomLarson 13:03:50 05/15/07 (5)
- Obviously. Yet - markrohr 15:13:52 05/15/07 (4)
- Re: Obviously. Yet - TomLarson 18:01:42 05/15/07 (3)
- I don't think... - robert young 14:13:51 05/17/07 (0)
- I believe I stipulated - markrohr 06:54:34 05/16/07 (1)
- And then there's it's - Thergit 05:29:53 06/17/07 (0)
- it's used in some of the most important literary classics in American history - Green Lantern 14:05:47 05/15/07 (1)
- Some of the most important WHAT?? Hahahahahaha! [nt] - Thergit 05:23:12 06/17/07 (0)
- Correction - Frank E 05/15/0717:56:11 05/15/07 (1)
- Apparently some here think it does...(nt) - mkuller 19:13:22 05/15/07 (0)
- If it's in your dictionary, you need a better dictionary. - markrohr 09:34:52 05/15/07 (1)
- 1954???... - Neil49 12:55:20 05/15/07 (0)
- Assembled Kits - Plinko 14:04:18 05/14/07 (0)
- I don't know either person but - Green Lantern 14:54:00 05/14/07 (3)
- Re: I don't know either person but - Len_ 17:17:21 05/14/07 (2)
- precisely! - Green Lantern 17:41:07 05/14/07 (1)
- Re: precisely! - Len_ 18:22:32 05/14/07 (0)
- I just read all of both of these posts... - Coffeecupman 18:58:26 05/14/07 (7)
- Re: I just read all of both of these posts... - Len_ 19:16:10 05/14/07 (0)
- Re: I just read all of both of these posts... - john curl 23:07:46 05/14/07 (4)
- Re: I just read all of both of these posts... - john curl 23:09:04 05/14/07 (3)
- LOL!(nt) - kuma 23:26:10 05/14/07 (0)
- Good one - Coffeecupman 03:39:16 05/15/07 (1)
- Re: Good one - john curl 08:47:29 05/15/07 (0)
- "Call the National Guard." They're a little tied up right now. - gme109 06:31:13 05/15/07 (0)
- An apology to John Curl - Len_ 19:27:44 05/14/07 (2)
- Re: An apology to John Curl - BrassTeacher 21:03:59 05/14/07 (0)
- Classy mea culpa...(nt) - mkuller 11:18:46 05/15/07 (0)
- Re: I thought this forum was about audio, not bashing people - LousyTourist 07:52:31 05/15/07 (0)
- Ron Welborne Warning - Soundripples 07:19:56 05/16/07 (1)
- With respect, you should have posted your own story - not somone elses again. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:14:21 05/16/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Correction - Frank E 05/15/0717:56:11 05/15/07 (1)
- Apparently some here think it does...(nt) - mkuller 19:13:22 05/15/07 (0)