Water Cooler Welcome! You must be a registered Inmate to post in this Asylum. |
|
In Reply to: So you want them to retract what you think you remember they printed? posted by castironandtubes on May 1, 2010 at 22:04:36:
I saw the headline. The headline was factually incorrect. I asked if anyone saw a retraction or a correction. (some newspapers do that - they correct mistakes)
You have a habit of reconstructing what one says in a manner which suits your perspective.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: So you want them to retract what you think you remember they printed? - audiogatorjim 05/1/1022:10:57 05/1/10 (10)
- If you're going to take the time to start a thread about a specific article in a specific publication - castironandtubes 22:27:01 05/1/10 (2)
- You guys are the ones who believe and read the - audiogatorjim 22:37:02 05/1/10 (1)
- Why the hell would I bother to search for something on your behalf? - castironandtubes 22:42:02 05/1/10 (0)
- You have the normal opportunity to confirm any inaccuracies in the perspectives of others,... :o) - feet's too big 22:25:23 05/1/10 (6)
- Feet, no offense, but most of the time, I have no - audiogatorjim 22:42:50 05/1/10 (5)
- Read slowly, to give your brain a little time to catch up?... :o) - feet's too big 23:05:13 05/1/10 (4)
- RE: Read slowly, to give your brain a little time to catch up?... :o) - audiogatorjim 23:40:12 05/1/10 (3)
- You could always have included that limited information in your original posting,... :o) - feet's too big 23:58:19 05/1/10 (2)
- OK. But, I'm not sure it makes a bit of difference - audiogatorjim 00:15:54 05/2/10 (1)
- I repeat, interpretations are either justified, or they are not,... :o) - feet's too big 00:27:55 05/2/10 (0)