Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: The contact area of a conical stylus is greater than an elliptical...hence posted by dave slagle on September 19, 2017 at 09:25:54:
> can somebody clarify how the "contact with record" dimensions relate to the "Contact surface" area?
That's a good question! I don't have a clue.
According to the contact patch dimension of a 0.7-mil stylus, it should have a contact area with one record groove wall of:
3.8 2 * (Pi) / 4 = 11.34-microns 2
Then I suppose you would multiply that by two since its sitting in a V-shaped groove for a total contact area of 22.68-microns 2 .
I don't understand how they came up with a contact surface of 30.5-microns 2 .
Your guess is as good as mine. :-)
Best regards,
John Elison
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The contact area of a conical stylus is greater than an elliptical...hence - John Elison 09/19/1710:16:53 09/19/17 (7)
- RE: The contact area of a conical stylus is greater than an elliptical...hence - dave slagle 13:58:24 09/19/17 (6)
- RE: The contact area of a conical stylus is greater than an elliptical...hence - John Elison 19:24:12 09/19/17 (5)
- Bear in mind the soure of the data - B.K. 09:11:03 10/1/17 (3)
- RE: Bear in mind the soure of the data - mkane77g 08:18:35 10/2/17 (2)
- RE: Bear in mind the soure of the data - B.K. 21:52:41 10/2/17 (1)
- Good point! - John Elison 03:19:47 10/4/17 (0)
- RE: The contact area of a conical stylus is greater than an elliptical...hence - dave slagle 06:57:59 09/21/17 (0)