RE: hum related

Posted by rrob (A) on January 17, 2015 at 14:38:04

In Reply to: RE: hum related posted by BPoletti on January 17, 2015 at 11:19:02:

Going back to the Tascam US 322 and removing the phono stage did lower the noise at 60 and 120 hz. But with the phono stage connected through the Grover Huffman shielded cables vs the Crystal Piccolos and Micros I normally use, it made no difference.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - hum related - rrob 08:09:10 01/17/15 (17)

RE: hum related - John Elison 09:49:20 01/17/15 (9)

Wow! Very interesting, John. Thanks. nt - andyr 03:07:25 01/18/15 (0)

RE: hum related or bearing noise? - rrob 10:20:54 01/17/15 (7)

RE: hum related or bearing noise? - John Elison 12:57:26 01/17/15 (6)

RE: hum related or bearing noise? - rrob 14:30:39 01/17/15 (5)

RE: hum related or bearing noise? - John Elison 15:41:50 01/17/15 (4)

RE: hum and motor noise - rrob 19:14:31 01/17/15 (3)

"With the motor spinning and the belt removed, the 120 hz frequency still increased" ... - andyr 17:20:51 01/18/15 (1)

RE: "With the motor spinning and the belt removed, the 120 hz frequency still increased" ... - rrob 17:44:31 01/18/15 (0)

Huh, goes to show that belt drive doesn't fix everything. -nt - Bry 13:18:28 01/18/15 (0)

RE: hum related - BPoletti 08:29:20 01/17/15 (6)

RE: hum related - rrob 09:18:05 01/17/15 (5)

RE: hum related - BPoletti 10:15:11 01/17/15 (4)

RE: hum related - rrob 10:51:39 01/17/15 (3)

RE: hum related - BPoletti 11:19:02 01/17/15 (2)

RE: hum related - rrob 01/17/1514:38:04 01/17/15 (0)

RE: hum related - rrob 11:45:52 01/17/15 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: hum related - rrob 01/17/1514:38:04 01/17/15 (0)

RE: hum related

Post a Message!