Greetings- I was under the impression (because I read it on the internet, so it has to be true !) that the larger Peerless output transformer (16458 ) that was used on the W5M was the "better" one, due to a larger core and higher bandwidth (I think?) than the smaller 16309. Today I read (on the Allegro Sound Website) that "the Special Peerless 16309 nickel-core output transformer is preferred because [below *]
(* later production used less-costly 16458 xfmr).
So which is it ?, has anyone actually tested these two transformers and compared the specs. This is realy bugging me. Thanks, wpod
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Peerless /Heathkit w5M output transformers- What gives? - wpod 17:33:22 09/4/14 (5)
- BTW - sony6060 06:33:37 09/6/14 (0)
- RE: Peerless /Heathkit w5M output transformers- What gives? - Michael Samra 22:05:35 09/4/14 (2)
- Perhaps higher PP Impedance contributes too - sony6060 06:19:17 09/5/14 (1)
- RE: Perhaps higher PP Impedance contributes too - Michael Samra 22:58:51 09/5/14 (0)
- RE: Peerless /Heathkit w5M output transformers- What gives? - Tre' 17:38:18 09/4/14 (0)