In Reply to: Perhaps I should restate the question ...... posted by H2_750 on July 17, 2005 at 05:16:23:
... there is nothing old-fashioned sounding about an HF-81, simple as that. I've abandoned SE 2A3's (albeit far from TOTL, but still very nice ones) for an HF-81 that I rehab'bed. I didn't use botique parts, 'cause the amp doesn't need it. I don't even have "good" EL84's... bought a quad of the JJ's from Uncle Ned. No complaints. And, BTW, I have nice OS 2A3's in my Paramours.Is the HF-81 "resolving"? I dunno; but it's certainly not smeary, if that's the opposite.
If you're uncertain about investing the $ in an HF-81, either don't do it :-) or find one and LISTEN to it. Where do you live? There's probably one within an hour of you.
Or... buy one speculatively. If you don't like it, re-sell it. Nothing to lose but some effort on your part and maybe one shipping charge.
all the best,
mrh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- listen, tell you what... - mhardy6647 07/17/0507:28:26 07/17/05 (0)