Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Opamp decoupling scheme posted by KanedaK on July 27, 2018 at 01:25:15:
Good question, and I hope someone else responds. There doesn't seem to be a definitive answer or consensus about which method is better, or even which type of cap is better, but I believe that the shortest path is the best. The important thing is to decouple, especially with higher speed opamps. Mixing the two methods will probably not be detrimental. It is, after all, LOCAL decoupling.
I've tinkered with this myself in my active xovers. For OPA627, decoupling is critical. After trying both methods, I could not say which one is better with any certainty. I violated the first rule by making the decoupling path an inch or so longer to get to a ground point rather than the simpler, shorter +/- single cap between the opamp supply pins. It might have sounded better with the separate plus/minus instead of the single cap across, and that's how I left it. There is another, less critical opamp in the filter, and it has the single + to - cap.
Peace,
Tom E
berate is 8 and benign is 9
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Opamp decoupling scheme - madisonears 07/27/1819:06:44 07/27/18 (5)
- RE: Opamp decoupling scheme - Ugly 23:43:35 07/27/18 (4)
- DM and CM Noise - 1973shovel 08:15:06 07/28/18 (3)
- RE: DM and CM Noise - Ugly 09:58:48 07/28/18 (2)
- Thank you (nt) - 1973shovel 16:14:35 07/31/18 (1)
- RE: Thank you (nt) - Ugly 19:08:57 08/1/18 (0)