![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Demagnetization posted by magiccarpetride on May 3, 2011 at 11:39:52:
It should really be called a burn-in or run-in track, as the purpose is to exercise all the elements of the audio system to amplitude and frequency extremes.
The overall idea is that use of extremely wide-band and highly varied amplitude signals cover all the possible electrical and mechanical extremes the system components need to cover with music, only instead of taking the sheer time (and possible bias) that music can take, it does it faster and more evenly.
One concrete example I can personally relate to is use of such signals for getting a tweeter with ferrofluid in it's voice coil gap to "stir-up" the ferrofluid so it will behave nominally. My experience has been that when left to set for days at a time, even modern ferrofluids tend to have the particles clump and settle a bit, and the thermal and mechanical stirring of the ferrofluid with the wide range and varied ampiltude signal tends to re-distribute those particles. This allows the tweeter to move more accurately and with less "noise floor" when playing music.
Many other aspects of the system can also be "stretched" by such a signal, so as to provide a more linear response when playing musical signals.
Music can do this as well, but if the system is used infrequently, or irregularly, use of the Test & Burn-in CD tracks can speed the process, and assure that the limits have been reached more quickly and thoroughly.
Jon Risch
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Misnomer - Jon Risch 05/3/1121:54:17 05/3/11 (26)
- RE: Misnomer - unclestu 16:18:54 05/6/11 (14)
- Just disregard the naysaying morons - both registered and unregistered. N/T - carcass93 08:46:54 05/9/11 (11)
- I also don't know wtf he's talking about - badman 07:21:13 05/11/11 (10)
- Nothing complex - unclestu 13:08:32 05/13/11 (7)
- Just more dirt ignorant gibberish - Steve Eddy 18:57:17 05/14/11 (6)
- RE: Just more dirt ignorant gibberish - IEaudiodude 12:20:37 05/16/11 (1)
- RE: Just more dirt ignorant gibberish - Steve Eddy 18:09:53 05/16/11 (0)
- Seems so, but odd that he keeps trying - badman 10:53:12 05/16/11 (3)
- LOL! - unclestu 16:28:48 05/16/11 (2)
- Your devotion to your listening impressions - badman 13:48:06 05/17/11 (0)
- RE: LOL! - Steve Eddy 18:16:33 05/16/11 (0)
- RE: I also don't know wtf he's talking about - Steve Eddy 08:18:37 05/12/11 (1)
- Seems about right- I don't get it - badman 09:45:43 05/12/11 (0)
- RE: Misnomer - smaaatguy 17:49:07 05/8/11 (0)
- RE: Misnomer - Steve Eddy 17:07:30 05/6/11 (0)
- Good reason not to use it - badman 15:07:45 05/4/11 (8)
- RE: Good reason not to use it - Jon Risch 21:36:06 05/4/11 (5)
- RE: Good reason not to use it - Æ 22:47:12 05/4/11 (4)
- I don't care for an extra degradation mechanism - badman 09:03:52 05/5/11 (3)
- RE: I don't care for an extra degradation mechanism - Æ 21:01:17 05/5/11 (2)
- Why the insulting tone? - badman 07:46:50 05/6/11 (1)
- RE: Why the insulting tone? - benie 17:06:15 05/7/11 (0)
- RE: Good reason not to use it - Æ 20:31:22 05/4/11 (1)
- RE:I guess all those engineers don't quite meet up to your standards. - badman 09:42:53 05/5/11 (0)
- RE: Misnomer - sailor321 06:46:13 05/4/11 (1)
- Which pink noise? - Jon Risch 21:13:11 05/4/11 (0)