![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: C'mon, ma man ... why are U calling it a "Passive Pre-amp"??? posted by andyr on August 16, 2004 at 05:26:42:
....a pre-amp can be passive. If you think of it in terms of pre meaning before, it can be viewed as a device that comes before the amplifier.......PRE-amplifier. The device itself doesn't have to do any amplifying, the descriptor only denotes it's position in the scheme of things.Oz
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Here's another way to look at it.... - Ozzy 08/16/0409:05:21 08/16/04 (5)
- Mate, "amp" is short for "amplifier" ... - andyr 13:30:47 08/16/04 (3)
- Re: Mate, "amp" is short for "amplifier" ... - Steve Eddy 16:07:12 08/16/04 (2)
- Aaaah, yes you're right!! ... - andyr 21:40:07 08/16/04 (1)
- Re: Aaaah, yes you're right!! ... - Steve Eddy 23:10:35 08/16/04 (0)
- True, Actually if amplification comes into play it should be a . . - John PA 09:34:09 08/16/04 (0)