![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: If so, then look at the AD811 or LM6171/72/6181/6182 and co.... posted by Thorsten on January 5, 2002 at 13:14:36:
Hi Thorsten,
What's wrong with the AD797 architecture?.
Double diamond I thought this was the LH002 style buffer also described in the Walt Jung Paper you are referring to.
ELSO
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: If so, then look at the AD811 or LM6171/72/6181/6182 and co.... - Elso Kwak 01/6/0202:33:44 01/6/02 (13)
- Thorsten will learn, someday..... - groamn 05:57:53 01/6/02 (11)
- Or maybe I have already learned and found some of the answers you are seeking? - Thorsten 06:45:19 01/6/02 (10)
- Apologies for bad expression! Thorsten - groman 00:31:43 01/7/02 (0)
- Re: Or maybe I have already learned and found some of the answers you are seeking? - Elso Kwak 07:39:46 01/6/02 (8)
- Re: Or maybe I have already learned and found some of the answers you are seeking? - Thorsten 08:00:56 01/6/02 (7)
- Re: Or maybe I have already learned and found some of the answers you are seeking? - terryb 11:37:49 01/6/02 (1)
- Re: Or maybe I have already learned and found some of the answers you are seeking? - Thorsten 12:11:04 01/8/02 (0)
- Re: Or maybe I have already learned and found some of the answers you are seeking? - Elso Kwak 08:26:42 01/6/02 (4)
- Re: Or maybe I have already learned and found some of the answers you are seeking? - Thorsten 09:05:36 01/6/02 (3)
- Re: Valid Comparison? - Elso Kwak 13:17:15 01/6/02 (2)
- Re: Valid Comparison? - Thorsten 03:42:47 01/7/02 (0)
- Re: Valid Comparison? - Ric Schultz 22:36:46 01/6/02 (0)
- Re: If so, then look at the AD811 or LM6171/72/6181/6182 and co.... - Thorsten 05:24:15 01/6/02 (0)