![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: TDA1541A sin(x)/x, I/V ... do I get this right posted by MBK on March 8, 2002 at 09:47:02:
Hi MBK,
You have a stepped 22.05 kHz outputsignal.
You can not bend the laws of physics: If you want a steep filter to attenuate as much as possible any unwanted highfrequency products above 20kHz you end up with a tenth order Butterworth filter or the like. This filter will have as much ringing and overshoot as a digital filter and bad sound too. The Bessel filter has no ringing or overshoot but less steep response, especially at and near the crossoverpoint. That's why I choose a third order active Bessel filter for my KWAK-DAC with the -3dB point at 10 kHz. This will attenuate about 16 dB at 22 kHz, of course more at higher frequencies.
Please note that a passive Bessel filter ideally has the same amplitude and phase response.The sin(x)/x is a other issue relating to a slight loss of high's at 20 kHz with NO filtering applied. To me this is of no concern.
It possible to use no filtering at all after the DAC. I believe Kusunoki does it this way. Be prepared for intermodulation products in the high frequencies. Some solid state or tubed equipment; (not mine!); does not seem to like to be bombarded with high frequency garbage, as are your tweeters, BEWARE!
Active Bessel filters are very easely designed with FilterPro from Burr-Brown; now Texas Instruments; in less than 5 minutes.
ELSO
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: TDA1541A sin(x)/x, I/V ... do I get this right - Elso Kwak 03/8/0214:24:40 03/8/02 (17)
- Ahhhhh!! - MBK 23:10:56 03/8/02 (11)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - Elso Kwak 03:35:28 03/12/02 (9)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - MBK 07:11:10 03/12/02 (8)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - Elso Kwak 00:20:14 03/13/02 (7)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - MBK 00:52:37 03/13/02 (6)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - Elso Kwak 09:46:24 03/13/02 (5)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - MBK 10:20:16 03/13/02 (4)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - Elso Kwak 12:29:28 03/13/02 (3)
- changed to resistor i/v now... - MBK 09:23:52 03/14/02 (0)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - MBK 02:06:17 03/14/02 (1)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - Elso Kwak 13:18:07 03/15/02 (0)
- Re: Ahhhhh!! - Thorsten 04:47:22 03/9/02 (0)
- Re: TDA1541A sin(x)/x, I/V ... do I get this right - Thorsten 15:28:55 03/8/02 (4)
- Re: TDA1541A sin(x)/x, I/V ... do I get this right - steve jones 11:06:50 03/9/02 (1)
- Re: TDA1541A sin(x)/x, I/V ... do I get this right - Thorsten 15:57:00 03/9/02 (0)
- Re: TDA1541A sin(x)/x, I/V ... do I get this right - JRR 20:20:14 03/8/02 (1)
- Re: TDA1541A sin(x)/x, I/V ... do I get this right - Thorsten 04:38:28 03/9/02 (0)