![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: 2SK117 or 2SK170 input stage?Better use 2SK389 posted by Elso Kwak on January 6, 2002 at 08:30:24:
I knew you would answer
2SK389.
As I can't get that one, I want to know your opinion
about 2SK117.Have you tried LM194, LM394
bipolar dual monolitic
see. DATASHEET
some intresting low noise circuits
groman
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 2SK117 or 2SK170 input stage?Better use 2SK389 - groman 01/6/0211:42:32 01/6/02 (8)
- Re: 2SK117 or 2SK170 input stage?Better use 2SK389 - capslock 10:34:58 01/7/02 (3)
- Re: 2SK117 or 2SK170 input stage?Better use 2SK389 - Elso Kwak 13:32:42 01/7/02 (0)
- Re: 2SK117 or 2SK170 input stage?Better use 2SK389 - john curl 12:00:23 01/7/02 (1)
- Re: 2SK117 or 2SK170 input stage?Better use 2SK389 - john curl 13:09:00 01/7/02 (0)
- Re: 2SK117 or 2SK170 input stage?Better use 2SK389 - Elso Kwak 13:04:17 01/6/02 (3)
- Okay, thanks. <nt> - groman 14:32:23 01/6/02 (2)
- Re: Okay, thanks. <nt> - john curl 15:15:53 01/6/02 (1)
- It is 6-14mA-117 - groman 17:50:55 01/6/02 (0)