In Reply to: To the Bored posted by gusser on September 14, 2017 at 14:24:31:
I think engineers can be closed minded about certain things.
Examples would help.
Lower THD means less overall distortion and therefore more truthfull to the source. Here is the number.
Yet it sounds worse.
Why?.. because they are measuring the wrong thing. (and we know what it is).
But thats the point. So you ask the designer why it sounds worse than something with more THD, and what would their response be?. He'd probably blame your ears, or something else, and then your ears.
I'm a tradesman, and I work in engineering support with engineers on submarine support and maintenance. They ARE different people, they do see things more black and white.. they are, more solid state in nature (shoot me). And as such are prone to just being who they are.
And so what?.
Be who you are, like what you like and otherwise with the other.
If this is your biggest problem, you have a good life.
The rest of it has been addressed elsewhere in the thread.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: To the Bored - shane. 09/14/1720:27:42 09/14/17 (37)
- No you think lower THD sounds worse. - gusser 21:00:02 09/14/17 (20)
- RE: No you think lower THD sounds worse. - shane. 21:20:17 09/14/17 (19)
- "Too many variables ... " - Stephen R 04:50:57 09/15/17 (1)
- RE: "Too many variables ... " - shane. 19:17:31 09/16/17 (0)
- So you like the sound of higher distortion? - gusser 21:29:30 09/14/17 (16)
- You could not validate Shane's point better if you tried. nt. - 91derlust 00:57:05 09/15/17 (3)
- RE: You could not validate Shane's point better if you tried. nt. - shane. 01:01:39 09/15/17 (2)
- RE: You could not validate Shane's point better if you tried. nt. - 91derlust 01:26:28 09/15/17 (1)
- RE: You could not validate Shane's point better if you tried. nt. - shane. 19:19:30 09/16/17 (0)
- Response to your question. - shane. 22:18:45 09/14/17 (0)
- RE: So you like the sound of higher distortion? - Ivan303 21:43:25 09/14/17 (0)
- Did I say that? - or are you just struggling to be rational? - shane. 21:40:46 09/14/17 (9)
- RE: Did I say that? - or are you just struggling to be rational? - gusser 22:56:30 09/14/17 (1)
- RE: Did I say that? - or are you just struggling to be rational? - shane. 22:58:31 09/14/17 (0)
- RE: Did I say that? - or are you just struggling to be rational? - Tre' 22:53:21 09/14/17 (6)
- One more thing about it - sser2 12:55:35 09/15/17 (2)
- Feedback turns positive? - gusser 18:11:19 09/17/17 (0)
- +1 (nt) - Tre' 18:22:01 09/15/17 (0)
- RE: Did I say that? - or are you just struggling to be rational? - shane. 22:57:43 09/14/17 (2)
- "THD is simply the reverse of DHT" - sser2 22:01:40 09/15/17 (1)
- RE: "THD is simply the reverse of DHT" - shane. 19:24:06 09/16/17 (0)
- LOL...Would you rather be on a sub designed, supported and maintained.... - Steve O 20:57:49 09/14/17 (15)
- 17,000 psi pressure hull.... - PakProtector 17:06:57 09/17/17 (0)
- ... or a Yellow Submarine? nt - sser2 15:10:14 09/15/17 (7)
- Aren't Yellow Submarines populated by tweakers by definition? (nt) - Steve O 15:58:58 09/15/17 (6)
- Probably. Can you show me a yellow submarine or it all in your head?. (nt) - shane. 19:38:28 09/16/17 (2)
- A yellow submarine!!!... - Steve O 21:20:21 09/16/17 (1)
- RE: A yellow submarine!!!... - shane. 21:27:34 09/16/17 (0)
- RE: Aren't Yellow Submarines populated by tweakers by definition? (nt) - vinnie2 17:37:08 09/15/17 (1)
- Of course! That should have been obvious. (nt) - Steve O 17:48:48 09/15/17 (0)
- That's what I meant. nt - sser2 16:05:31 09/15/17 (0)
- RE: LOL...Would you rather be on a sub designed, supported and maintained.... - shane. 21:04:18 09/14/17 (5)
- RE: LOL...Would you rather be on a sub designed, supported and maintained.... - shane. 00:58:27 09/15/17 (0)
- Of course I "got that"... - Steve O 21:37:06 09/14/17 (3)
- RE: Of course I "got that"... - shane. 21:45:51 09/14/17 (2)
- I take it you didn't read what you (sorta) linked... - Steve O 22:11:36 09/14/17 (1)
- RE: I take it you didn't read what you (sorta) linked... - shane. 22:28:47 09/14/17 (0)