In Reply to: RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question posted by Garg0yle on September 6, 2015 at 09:09:10:
"How do you know 1000 hours is 95% broken in?"
Is that what I wrote? Check your reading comprehension.
I see that you want to turn this into some kind of subjectivist/objectivist argument. If your standards require some form of rigorous A/B comparisons; then no, I did not attempt to do this and you can feel free to ignore what I wrote. If putting percentage numbers to my subjective observations offends your sense of rigor then I will amend my statement:
After about 300 hours or so, the transformers seemed to be well on their way to being broken-in. After 500 hours, give or take 50 hours, some further small improvement was discernable. After approximately 1000 hours another very small improvement was apparent to me (it's small so I may be fooling myself). After ten more years of on and off use (who knows how many hours) no further improvements were noted.
"It is better to remain silent and thought a fool, then speak and remove all doubt." A. Lincoln
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - JKT 09/6/1511:58:20 09/6/15 (7)
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - Garg0yle 20:06:40 09/6/15 (1)
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - amnesiac 08:46:38 09/7/15 (0)
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - cpotl 12:13:05 09/6/15 (4)
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - JKT 15:12:32 09/6/15 (3)
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - cpotl 16:35:30 09/6/15 (2)
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - JKT 19:18:19 09/6/15 (1)
- RE: Transformer "Break-in" Question - cpotl 19:26:02 09/6/15 (0)