In Reply to: RE: 6SL7 Ratings posted by Thorsten on December 23, 2010 at 09:59:00:
T
I feel like I am argueing a given here.
You keep saying all things being equal
you would go for wide bandwidth.
They are equal at the designing point
which we are at here in Tube DIY Asylum.
Why design a HF phase shift at 20KHz
when you could design it without any?
Because other things before and after
have phase shifts is irrelevant.
If we shouldn't both with phase shifts
then we shouldn't bother with response
because speakers have aren't perfect.
We shouldn't worry about output impedance
and loadlines because speakers don't
have a flat impedance (except ribbons).
You could wave away with your hand almost
any design parameter with similar arguements.
I just do not see any credibility
to your arguement.
Every parameter should be optimized in a design
if it isn't then redesign until it is.
Good enough should not be good enough here.
I strive for excellance not good enough.
DanL
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - danlaudionut 12/23/1013:23:51 12/23/10 (11)
- Hi Dan...I will weigh in on this one: The 6SL7 has a lot of "Goodness" - Minussss3db 16:19:33 12/26/10 (2)
- RE: Hi Dan...I will weigh in on this one: The 6SL7 has a lot of "Goodness" - danlaudionut 19:29:53 12/26/10 (1)
- RE: Hi Dan Yes Dan 1.5v is right for the 6n1p...but I think... - Minussss3db 22:26:49 12/27/10 (0)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - Thorsten 20:29:11 12/23/10 (7)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - Tre' 21:35:43 12/23/10 (5)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - Thorsten 22:55:24 12/23/10 (4)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - Tre' 08:59:32 12/24/10 (2)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - Thorsten 20:42:46 12/24/10 (1)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - Tre' 22:31:23 12/24/10 (0)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - Stephen R 02:37:54 12/24/10 (0)
- RE: 6SL7 Ratings - danlaudionut 21:22:04 12/23/10 (0)