In Reply to: Power transformer DCR sets the dynamic impedance. posted by JLH on June 30, 2009 at 04:23:03:
In my supply if the current draw is increased by 10% the voltage drops 2.8 volts.That would calculate to 437 ohm power supply impedance.
However there is nothing, in a music signal, that would cause this to happen. (in a Class A amplifier)
The longest duration current change, caused by music, would be 12.5ms (1/4 wave, 20hz).
A 10% current increase, over 12.5ms, causes a voltage drop of .3 volts.
That would calculate to 46.8 ohms power supply impedance.
If I increase the microfarad value of the last cap in the supply from 260uf to 4000uf (just to pick some numbers) the voltage drop over the 12.5ms duration is only .02 volts.
This would calculate to 3.125 ohms power supply impedance.
So I guess my bottom line question to you is, What do you mean by "dynamic impedance"?
Thanks, Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Power transformer DCR sets the dynamic impedance. - Tre' 06/30/0908:46:19 06/30/09 (33)
- Dynamic impedance explained - JLH 04:36:38 07/1/09 (24)
- RE: Dynamic impedance explained - zobsky 11:14:24 07/2/09 (1)
- R input filters - drlowmu 14:32:54 07/2/09 (0)
- RE: Dynamic impedance explained - Michael Koster 08:54:13 07/2/09 (11)
- It’s not about averages, it about instantaneous. (nt) - JLH 12:21:50 07/2/09 (7)
- RE: It’s not about averages, it about instantaneous. (nt) - Michael Koster 12:50:01 07/2/09 (6)
- The PSUD step function - tweakydee 20:02:17 07/2/09 (3)
- RE: The PSUD step function - Michael Koster 08:11:03 07/3/09 (2)
- great, thanks! nt - tweakydee 07:10:41 07/4/09 (0)
- RE: The PSUD step function - PakProtector 09:04:50 07/3/09 (0)
- RE: It’s not about averages, it about instantaneous. (nt) - PakProtector 13:27:16 07/2/09 (1)
- RE: It’s not about averages, it about instantaneous. (nt) - tube wrangler 20:27:08 07/2/09 (0)
- Great points - Tre' 10:49:32 07/2/09 (2)
- RE: Great points - tube wrangler 20:45:50 07/2/09 (1)
- revisionist history - PakProtector 04:42:50 07/3/09 (0)
- RE: Dynamic impedance explained - Testing123 09:31:18 07/1/09 (5)
- RE: Dynamic impedance explained - rdf 12:21:23 07/2/09 (0)
- Who IS this "Testing 123" and WHAT are his (or her) qualifications?? - drlowmu 06:24:06 07/2/09 (3)
- RE: Who IS this "Testing 123" and WHAT are his (or her) qualifications?? - Testing123 10:22:08 07/2/09 (0)
- Completely irrelevant. - Ray Moth 08:51:49 07/2/09 (0)
- Ability to reason carefully, and write clearly - PakProtector 07:04:40 07/2/09 (0)
- RE: Dynamic impedance explained - Tre' 09:23:45 07/1/09 (1)
- RE: Dynamic impedance explained - PakProtector 05:30:02 07/2/09 (0)
- A masterful explanation... - coronadope 08:02:07 07/1/09 (1)
- Brilliant post... - Nickel Core 08:33:04 07/1/09 (0)
- RE: Power transformer DCR sets the dynamic impedance. - Testing123 09:10:51 06/30/09 (7)
- RE: Power transformer DCR sets the dynamic impedance. - Tre' 10:38:27 06/30/09 (6)
- Piling On - drlowmu 06:25:51 07/1/09 (5)
- When are you going to stop doing this? - Ray Moth 10:36:15 07/1/09 (4)
- RE: When are you going to stop doing this? - PakProtector 11:00:25 07/1/09 (3)
- Then we shall have to agree to differ - Ray Moth 11:11:34 07/1/09 (2)
- RE: Then we shall have to agree to differ - drlowmu 06:31:05 07/2/09 (1)
- RE: Then we shall have to agree to differ - Ray Moth 15:56:32 07/3/09 (0)