In Reply to: Bypass a cathode bypass capacitor, is it a good idea? posted by cktc on February 2, 2022 at 01:02:15:
More specific of my previous question: with my limited knowledge, the high value electrolytic cathode bypass capacitor allows only bass frequency to passthrough. If I add a small value film cap to that position, it will also allow the high frequency passthrough, will it creates ill effect?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- more specific question - cktc 02/2/2210:31:38 02/2/22 (78)
- RE: more specific question - Thermionic27609 14:26:35 02/2/22 (77)
- RE: more specific question - drlowmu 17:23:24 02/2/22 (76)
- There is much more to it than that - Tre' 18:45:57 02/2/22 (75)
- RE: standard engineering formula - deathtube 667 07:01:13 02/3/22 (73)
- RE: standard engineering formula - Tre' 08:19:59 02/3/22 (72)
- Would cathode bypass capacitor at input stage affect output impedance? - Lew 10:10:56 02/4/22 (4)
- No - Tre' 15:33:06 02/4/22 (1)
- I asked because I understood you to be suggesting otherwise - Lew 06:50:05 02/6/22 (0)
- RE: Would cathode bypass capacitor at input stage affect output impedance? - 91derlust 12:36:56 02/4/22 (1)
- RE: Would cathode bypass capacitor at input stage affect output impedance? - Lew 13:46:51 02/7/22 (0)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - deathtube 667 16:13:52 02/3/22 (62)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - gusser 16:20:34 02/3/22 (61)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - deathtube 667 16:47:25 02/3/22 (60)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - tube wrangler 11:41:05 02/4/22 (1)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - rage 14:07:13 02/4/22 (0)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - Tre' 18:23:43 02/3/22 (57)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - deathtube 667 03:01:43 02/4/22 (56)
- RE: 15uF ... main bypass cap value for SE amplifiers - PakProtector 05:39:06 02/4/22 (55)
- RE: linear design ... - deathtube 667 07:39:24 02/4/22 (54)
- RE: linear design ... - PakProtector 07:51:56 02/4/22 (53)
- RE: effects box ... - deathtube 667 08:42:47 02/4/22 (52)
- Why yes... - PakProtector 14:48:59 02/4/22 (6)
- RE: Why yes... - pictureguy 15:58:28 02/4/22 (5)
- NO matter what company, Automatically subtract 3db... has worked well for 30 years-nT - Cleantimestream 09:39:01 02/5/22 (1)
- RE: NO matter what company, Automatically subtract 3db... has worked well for 30 years-nT - pictureguy 14:14:51 02/7/22 (0)
- RE: Why yes... - PakProtector 16:14:18 02/4/22 (2)
- RE: Why yes... - pictureguy 14:17:52 02/7/22 (0)
- RE: Why yes... - pictureguy 20:56:14 02/4/22 (0)
- Subjective Criteria - drlowmu 11:44:22 02/4/22 (44)
- RE: Subjective Criteria - PakProtector 03:22:35 02/5/22 (43)
- RE: Subjective Criteria, and the word " defect " - drlowmu 07:56:09 02/5/22 (42)
- RE: the "concepts" are not defects ... - deathtube 667 09:08:24 02/6/22 (40)
- RE: the "concepts" are not defects ... - 91derlust 16:56:18 02/7/22 (7)
- RE: exclusive club ... - deathtube 667 05:35:55 02/9/22 (6)
- I think you have it backwards.... - PakProtector 09:14:31 02/9/22 (5)
- RE: I think you have not changed ... - deathtube 667 06:17:07 02/10/22 (1)
- RE: I think you have not changed ... - PakProtector 04:28:23 02/11/22 (0)
- RE: I think you have it backwards.... - tube wrangler 10:10:15 02/9/22 (2)
- yep...backwards - PakProtector 14:46:05 02/9/22 (0)
- RE: I think you have it backwards.... - Tre' 10:28:18 02/9/22 (0)
- RE: the "concepts" are not defects ... - PakProtector 15:14:14 02/6/22 (31)
- RE :answer the call of greatness - deathtube 667 15:39:37 02/6/22 (30)
- Vague grandiose statements (one could liken to Camelot) will not augment your credibility - Cleantimestream 05:11:50 02/7/22 (25)
- RE: the credibility was established at RMAF ... - deathtube 667 07:10:19 02/7/22 (24)
- The truth is self evident that you have not heard mine nor many other amps built by those on this forum ergo, - Cleantimestream 08:29:43 02/8/22 (12)
- RE: it was your design ... - deathtube 667 08:55:47 02/8/22 (11)
- RE: it was your design ... - drlowmu 10:41:41 02/8/22 (3)
- RE: it was your design ... - Cleantimestream 11:15:27 02/8/22 (2)
- RE: it was your design ... - drlowmu 12:17:02 02/8/22 (1)
- RE: it was your design ... - GEO 20:06:44 02/8/22 (0)
- RE: it was your design ... - Tre' 09:29:13 02/8/22 (6)
- RE: it was your design ... - drlowmu 10:18:05 02/8/22 (1)
- RE: it was your design ... - Tre' 10:44:12 02/8/22 (0)
- I think ya forgot a feature - PakProtector 09:37:04 02/8/22 (3)
- I did fail to include that short comming. - Tre' 10:25:42 02/8/22 (2)
- RE: I did fail to include that short comming. - drlowmu 11:09:28 02/8/22 (1)
- RE: I did fail to include that short comming. - PakProtector 16:53:12 02/8/22 (0)
- RE: the credibility was established at RMAF ... - drlowmu 10:53:02 02/7/22 (10)
- RE: the credibility was established at RMAF ... - awsjr 05:53:39 02/8/22 (8)
- RE: the credibility was established at RMAF ... - drlowmu 09:03:18 02/8/22 (7)
- You forgot a wee bit... - PakProtector 17:12:35 02/8/22 (5)
- RE: You forgot a wee bit... - rage 07:19:15 02/9/22 (4)
- RE: MV rectifier + flywheel ... - deathtube 667 08:16:21 02/9/22 (1)
- RE: MV rectifier + flywheel ... - rage 09:42:35 02/9/22 (0)
- RE: You forgot a wee bit... - PakProtector 07:30:37 02/9/22 (1)
- RE: You forgot a wee bit... - rage 07:47:13 02/9/22 (0)
- RE: the credibility was established at RMAF ... - awsjr 10:17:41 02/8/22 (0)
- RE: the credibility was established at RMAF ... - PakProtector 14:51:13 02/7/22 (0)
- RE: RE :answer the call of greatness - PakProtector 16:23:49 02/6/22 (3)
- Having some trouble finding something happybear? - PakProtector 01:35:48 02/8/22 (2)
- RE: finding something ... - deathtube 667 08:51:29 02/8/22 (1)
- back to our regurly scheduled effects box worship... :) - PakProtector 09:44:21 02/8/22 (0)
- RE: Subjective Criteria, and the word " defect " - PakProtector 08:11:16 02/5/22 (0)
- RE: standard engineering formula - tube wrangler 15:43:21 02/3/22 (1)
- RE: standard engineering formula - PakProtector 16:02:00 02/3/22 (0)
- Simple answer! - gusser 13:03:26 02/3/22 (1)
- Oh my... :) - PakProtector 14:36:52 02/3/22 (0)
- RE: There is much more to it than that - drlowmu 19:44:47 02/2/22 (0)