In Reply to: RE: The 3rd harmonic posted by Ralph on January 4, 2021 at 13:07:27:
your NFB signal is SE.
I slightly disagree with your compare based on power.
PP is going to need two finals, so double the SE amp(pse). Not quite an apples-apples comparison. Part of the benefit to PP is more power...if you want SE for some reason, live with that limitation...:)
I think you'll find that the magnetic behaviour of a gapped signal Iron noticeable. For the amps I have built of late, this gap is delivered to its CT'd grid choke. The L vs signal magnitude plot is different. SE nearly has to do it with its OPT( even if the OPT is 'distributed', parafeed style ).
I have found it easier to build an amp that is Class A. AB makes a radically different load on the PS. In Class A the non-linearities are what presents an AC load, so a performance restriction from the PS could be considered a benefit. Now I don't tend to build a lightweight PS, even for thoroughly Class A amps, so take that as supposition.
While we are at this, who is making Class A PP for sale?
cheers,
Douglas
Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- and yet... - PakProtector 01/4/2115:17:24 01/4/21 (12)
- What I wanted was low power and high quality in a small package - Ralph 09:32:11 01/5/21 (2)
- RE: What I wanted was low power and high quality in a small package - PakProtector 13:03:58 01/5/21 (1)
- I probably could have gotten the power SE - Ralph 13:45:36 01/5/21 (0)
- RE: and yet... - dave slagle 17:58:59 01/4/21 (5)
- Yup. nt - Tre' 18:40:38 01/4/21 (4)
- RE: Yup. nt - PakProtector 03:35:57 01/5/21 (3)
- RE: Yup. nt - dave slagle 06:44:11 01/5/21 (2)
- RE: Yup. nt - PakProtector 03:39:52 01/6/21 (0)
- "a whole new can o' squiggly things" :-) Nice post dave, thanks. nt - Tre' 07:24:29 01/5/21 (0)
- RE: and yet... - rivervalley817 16:02:27 01/4/21 (2)
- RE: and yet... - PakProtector 16:07:04 01/4/21 (1)
- RE: and yet... - kyle 08:51:45 01/5/21 (0)