In Reply to: Would you mind... posted by wheezer on September 17, 2012 at 06:56:33:
My only experience with these has been with Dale aluminum-housed, heat-sink types.
These generate a lot of heat in free air with very little power thru them. It amazes me how little it takes if there is no heat-sink.
If you're using a chassis as a heat sink, you are heating that part of the chassis more than other areas. This heat-created area is different in density and temp from other areas.
The heat differences aren't conducive to max. performance of the chassis as a neutral device.
Magnetic fields also differ in the heat-sinked and non-heat-sinked areas.
I do not know all of the possibilities for mischief from this-- but common sense tells me some of them. The difference in sound quality between a uniformly made and operated chassis, and one that has different anomalies in either its construction or in its activation induced from various influences on it-- heat and magnetism in the wrong places being only two of them-- the difference in performance of the circuit is obvious when you're comparing amp A- to, say, amp B-- one with a proper-operated chassis and the other with one or more of these problems-- is evident on listening.
Perhaps someone here would care to elaborate on this-- I'm afraid I have only partially answered your question.
Rest assured that this anomaly DOES EXIST if you allow it.
I have used chassis-cooling for FWB's in low-volt power supplies with very few problems-- In these cases, I used Wakefield aluminum coolers bolted onto a chassis bottom that was also aluminum-- the chassis bottom had been cleaned and as much as possible, the aluminum heat sink bonded with it.
As voltages get higher (as in tube plate supplies, etc.), I would tend to avoid letting any part of a circuit get anywhere near a metal chassis.
This attention to detail is far more important in a S.E. amp than it is in a Push-Pull circuit.
---Dennis---
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Would you mind... - tube wrangler 09/17/1219:22:56 09/17/12 (8)
- RE: Would you mind... - raq 05:46:03 09/19/12 (0)
- RE: Would you mind... - wheezer 22:56:00 09/17/12 (0)
- RE: Would you mind... - timp 20:50:48 09/17/12 (5)
- RE: Would you mind... - mikeyb 06:05:52 09/18/12 (4)
- RE: Would you mind... - wheezer 08:44:05 09/18/12 (3)
- RE: Would you mind... - tube wrangler 20:48:51 09/18/12 (2)
- RE: Would you mind... - wheezer 05:27:42 09/19/12 (0)
- RE: Would you mind... - Triode_Kingdom 21:22:57 09/18/12 (0)