In Reply to: You don't wanna use that posted by Russ57 on July 31, 2007 at 16:45:45:
Hi Russ - Educate me please. The only differences I notice from one side to the other are the 30 pf cap on pin 5 and the additional 27k resistor. I've seen other schematics that use the two 270k resistors only and I wondered why that 27k would be there.
Is this what makes it a paraphase? Would removing one or both of those parts make it more suitable for use with NOS PP 6B4Gs? Is there a circuit that uses a single 6SN7 per channel that would be better?
Any idea how much input voltage it would take to get full output with this?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You don't wanna use that - FlaCharlie 07/31/0717:17:51 07/31/07 (43)
- Okay - Russ57 18:13:24 07/31/07 (42)
- Here's An Alternative - Better?? - FlaCharlie 09:24:13 08/1/07 (37)
- RE: Here's An Alternative - Better?? - mikeyb 10:18:15 08/1/07 (36)
- Two Questions - FlaCharlie 10:54:57 08/1/07 (7)
- RE: Two Questions - mikeyb 13:16:09 08/1/07 (6)
- OK . . . So . . . Working Through This . . . - FlaCharlie 14:34:54 08/1/07 (5)
- What About the Gain Issue? - FlaCharlie 19:07:30 08/1/07 (1)
- Try looking here - Russ57 07:55:47 08/2/07 (0)
- RE: OK . . . So . . . Working Through This . . . - mikeyb 18:48:13 08/1/07 (2)
- Why Would a Negative Supply Be Necessary? - FlaCharlie 18:31:42 08/2/07 (1)
- RE: Why Would a Negative Supply Be Necessary? - mikeyb 05:45:02 08/3/07 (0)
- RE: Here's An Alternative - Better?? - dave slagle 10:39:20 08/1/07 (27)
- RE: Here's An Alternative - Better?? - mikeyb 13:04:47 08/1/07 (26)
- RE: Here's An Alternative - Better?? - Dave Cigna 14:07:14 08/1/07 (25)
- RE: not buying it - Ralph 13:10:55 08/2/07 (24)
- RE: not buying it - Dave Cigna 14:05:32 08/2/07 (23)
- RE: still not buying it - Ralph 14:31:26 08/2/07 (22)
- I'll try to explain it as well as I can. - Dave Cigna 16:25:00 08/2/07 (21)
- RE: I missed the ground connection - Ralph 10:12:44 08/3/07 (20)
- RE: I missed the ground connection - Dave Cigna 12:56:29 08/3/07 (19)
- RE: Funny though, I knew there was something wrong with your argument - Ralph 14:26:56 08/3/07 (18)
- That's interesting - Dave Cigna 06:02:54 08/4/07 (17)
- Thanks to Everyone . . . And Another Question or Two - FlaCharlie 12:17:12 08/4/07 (2)
- RE: Thanks to Everyone . . . And Another Question or Two - Ralph 16:57:50 08/5/07 (0)
- RE: Thanks to Everyone . . . And Another Question or Two - Dave Cigna 15:55:47 08/5/07 (0)
- another thought - Dave Cigna 11:13:52 08/4/07 (13)
- RE: another thought - Ralph 16:40:04 08/5/07 (12)
- RE: another thought - Dave Cigna 08:50:37 08/6/07 (11)
- RE: crow 10:1 - Ralph 10:57:16 08/6/07 (10)
- RE: crow 10:1 - Dave Cigna 08:17:46 08/8/07 (0)
- Will The Paraphase Need Feedback? - FlaCharlie 12:10:36 08/6/07 (2)
- Pete's circuit - Russ57 14:27:19 08/6/07 (0)
- RE: Will The Paraphase Need Feedback? - Ralph 13:29:24 08/6/07 (0)
- differential driver is the more elegant - Russ57 11:59:53 08/6/07 (5)
- RE: differential driver is the more elegant - Dave Cigna 08:39:10 08/8/07 (2)
- Spice scares me....maybe too many dune novels...LOL - Russ57 16:18:53 08/8/07 (1)
- RE: Spice scares me....maybe too many dune novels...LOL - dave slagle 19:29:45 08/8/07 (0)
- Is It Possible? - FlaCharlie 10:34:11 08/7/07 (1)
- RE: Is It Possible? - Dave Cigna 09:03:19 08/8/07 (0)
- RE: Okay - FlaCharlie 20:31:30 07/31/07 (0)
- RE: Okay - dave slagle 18:39:03 07/31/07 (2)
- What do you think of.... - Russ57 05:17:14 08/1/07 (1)
- RE: What do you think of.... - griboon 18:14:42 08/1/07 (0)