In Reply to: maybe you won't get it.... posted by Sector-7G on December 1, 2004 at 09:21:25:
why not try working out Steve Bench's example as provided on his website? Wherein the anode to anode impedance is 8800 ohms while each tube works into a primary reflected impedance of 2200 ohms.Maybe Steve's examples and methods will be less confusing to you.
Mike
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Capacitance in early vintage amps ..... ( Long) - drummerwillwr 19:36:28 11/27/04 (89)
- I have done the same, - j rodney 12:19:55 11/29/04 (71)
- Re: I have done the same, - Joelt 05:35:15 12/1/04 (3)
- Joel, please do not be an ass - j rodney 11:42:13 12/1/04 (2)
- not trying to be an ass, Rodney - Joelt 05:57:26 12/2/04 (1)
- perhaps, very long hours at work recently, - j rodney 10:26:48 12/2/04 (0)
- Good man. - D Harvey 16:09:06 11/30/04 (66)
- Re: Good man. - Joelt 05:36:29 12/1/04 (0)
- sonics and tolerance - Sector-7G 17:36:19 11/30/04 (64)
- Re: sonics and tolerance - D Harvey 17:55:08 12/1/04 (1)
- it was just an example.... - Sector-7G 19:36:56 12/1/04 (0)
- If only RCA had realized that..... - mqracing 18:41:22 11/30/04 (61)
- RCA and other stories... :-) - Damir_the real one 04:58:10 12/1/04 (34)
- Re: RCA and other stories... :-) - mqracing 08:10:06 12/1/04 (4)
- Re: RCA and other stories... :-) - Damir_the real one 11:18:26 12/1/04 (0)
- what you seem to keep missing... - Sector-7G 09:14:20 12/1/04 (2)
- Re: what you seem to keep missing... - mqracing 10:28:20 12/1/04 (1)
- so one tube in a PP pair is...What? - Sector-7G 10:44:02 12/1/04 (0)
- Saaaay... - D Harvey 05:08:17 12/1/04 (28)
- Saaaay... - Sector-7G 05:26:56 12/1/04 (27)
- Re: Saaaay... - D Harvey 18:02:19 12/1/04 (0)
- Re: Saaaay... - mqracing 06:32:24 12/1/04 (25)
- reflected impedance ...yes...yes - Tre' 09:08:08 12/1/04 (23)
- it is like that cell-phone ad... - Sector-7G 09:36:11 12/1/04 (22)
- Re: it is like that cell-phone ad... - mqracing 10:20:12 12/1/04 (21)
- Mike would you please answer one question - Tre' 17:05:28 12/1/04 (10)
- I'm confused... did everybody miss this class - Gordon Rankin 07:03:25 12/2/04 (3)
- Re: I'm confused... did everybody miss this class - dave slagle 13:27:41 12/2/04 (0)
- Re: I'm not confused :-) - PP model - Damir _the real one 09:40:51 12/2/04 (0)
- well then Gordon.... - Sector-7G 08:17:03 12/2/04 (0)
- Re: Mike would you please answer one question - mqracing 17:47:22 12/1/04 (5)
- So does all that mean AA/4? - Tre' 18:58:49 12/1/04 (4)
- Hey Mike, what did that post say? The one you just deleted - Tre' 21:40:36 12/1/04 (2)
- there is all sorts or silly stuff - Sector-7G 04:43:24 12/2/04 (1)
- or, welcome back the the Dark Ages - Sector-7G 10:11:36 12/2/04 (0)
- Mike, I re-read your post and I think you are saying... - Tre' 21:08:54 12/1/04 (1)
- since you refuse to look at what you requested.... - Sector-7G 10:49:24 12/1/04 (9)
- Re: since you refuse to look at what you requested.... - mqracing 11:51:15 12/1/04 (8)
- wow..did I do all that? *NOT* - Sector-7G 12:40:02 12/1/04 (0)
- bad... - Damir_the real one 12:03:44 12/1/04 (6)
- Yes Mike, would you return Damir's moniker? - Russ57 12:21:09 12/1/04 (5)
- I would if it were mine to return to him - mqracing 13:13:54 12/1/04 (4)
- Then I sincerly apologize - Russ57 15:49:53 12/1/04 (1)
- Re: Then I sincerly apologize - mqracing 15:58:41 12/1/04 (0)
- done by you, done in your name... - Sector-7G 13:39:24 12/1/04 (0)
- Re: I would if it were mine to return to him - Damir_the real one 13:34:26 12/1/04 (0)
- this is getting old... - Sector-7G 06:44:23 12/1/04 (0)
- keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 19:35:57 11/30/04 (25)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 20:38:53 11/30/04 (24)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 05:19:02 12/1/04 (1)
- Wow... - Damir_the real one 05:36:00 12/1/04 (0)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 04:37:21 12/1/04 (19)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 07:08:56 12/1/04 (18)
- this is where you have gone wrong... - Sector-7G 05:06:34 12/4/04 (0)
- keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 07:50:10 12/1/04 (16)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 08:50:24 12/1/04 (15)
- References... - Damir _ the real one 10:51:27 12/1/04 (1)
- Here is an old published example - Russ57 10:03:15 12/1/04 (5)
- Re: Here is an old published example - mqracing 12:36:02 12/1/04 (4)
- Re: Here is an old published example - Dave Cigna 14:12:10 12/2/04 (1)
- or... - Sector-7G 14:58:52 12/2/04 (0)
- Well, you did ask for a published reference:) - Russ57 10:23:13 12/2/04 (0)
- well, I'll just add him to the list... - Sector-7G 12:47:45 12/1/04 (0)
- since you want it out in the open... - Sector-7G 09:33:05 12/1/04 (0)
- maybe you won't get it.... - Sector-7G 09:21:25 12/1/04 (6)
- or, if you find Crowhurst too confusing or complex.... - mqracing 12/1/0410:54:03 12/1/04 (3)
- you can't even compute a load line value from its slope... - Sector-7G 11:00:41 12/1/04 (2)
- go for it Dougie.... - mqracing 12:21:41 12/1/04 (1)
- thank you Mike... - Sector-7G 06:17:03 12/2/04 (0)
- keep reading dougie.... - mqracing 10:52:00 12/1/04 (1)
- why? - Sector-7G 09:11:51 12/2/04 (0)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Damir_the real one 23:08:35 11/30/04 (1)
- Now this I like a lot.....great explanation...thanks(nt) - Russ57 07:22:38 12/1/04 (0)
- Re: Capacitance in early vintage amps ..... ( Long) - Joelt 20:05:05 11/27/04 (16)
- feedback? what feedback? - Dave Cigna 08:28:32 11/28/04 (11)
- Re: feedback? what feedback? - Joelt 14:03:56 11/28/04 (10)
- Re: feedback? what feedback? - Dave Cigna 16:14:52 11/28/04 (9)
- so much to learn, young Cigna. - Joelt 09:14:14 11/29/04 (6)
- Re: so much to learn, young Cigna. - Dave Cigna 14:54:21 11/29/04 (5)
- Re: so much to learn, young Cigna. - Joelt 15:05:05 11/29/04 (4)
- Re: so much to learn, young Cigna. - Lew 10:46:46 11/30/04 (2)
- Re: so much to learn, young Cigna. - Henry Pasternack 18:03:22 11/30/04 (1)
- not the "sections" of the B supply - Joelt 05:27:12 12/1/04 (0)
- Re: so much to learn, young Cigna. - Tre' 15:09:15 11/29/04 (0)
- Re: feedback? what feedback? ... circuit.. - drummerwillwr 19:12:21 11/28/04 (1)
- Re: feedback? what feedback? ... circuit.. - Dave Cigna 14:50:57 11/29/04 (0)
- Yes , But ....... - drummerwillwr 07:01:00 11/28/04 (3)
- Re: Yes , But ....... - Joelt 14:13:12 11/28/04 (2)
- Re: Yes , But ....... - D Harvey 21:39:05 11/28/04 (0)
- Re: Yes , But ....... - drummerwillwr 18:59:49 11/28/04 (0)
Follow Ups
- or, if you find Crowhurst too confusing or complex.... - mqracing 12/1/0410:54:03 12/1/04 (3)
- you can't even compute a load line value from its slope... - Sector-7G 11:00:41 12/1/04 (2)
- go for it Dougie.... - mqracing 12:21:41 12/1/04 (1)
- thank you Mike... - Sector-7G 06:17:03 12/2/04 (0)