In Reply to: If only RCA had realized that..... posted by mqracing on November 30, 2004 at 18:41:22:
probably 'later'.so why does the law of conservation of energy not apply to your claim of a-a/4?
The measurements were posted, taken from a real OPT. no matter what sort of literature you dig up to confirm your opinion, it is not going to change what is actually happening. I see that you have not made ention of NC, whose article actually showed that he contradicted himself a few times, in addition to confusing a number of folks who should know better( yourself included ). NC made a one sentence notice of the actual load, and provided a plot of said load.
It was *NOT* a-a/4.
If you're going to stick your neck out, why not look around first. RDH3 on one of its pages gave a description, and equation and refrence to something other than a-a/4, and that equation matches the actual data in the NC article in the Glass Audio page. I have not looked after their reference yet.
regards,
Douglas
!
mmmmmhhhh...Forbidden Donut!!!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 11/30/0419:35:57 11/30/04 (25)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 20:38:53 11/30/04 (24)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 05:19:02 12/1/04 (1)
- Wow... - Damir_the real one 05:36:00 12/1/04 (0)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 04:37:21 12/1/04 (19)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 07:08:56 12/1/04 (18)
- this is where you have gone wrong... - Sector-7G 05:06:34 12/4/04 (0)
- keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 07:50:10 12/1/04 (16)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 08:50:24 12/1/04 (15)
- References... - Damir _ the real one 10:51:27 12/1/04 (1)
- Here is an old published example - Russ57 10:03:15 12/1/04 (5)
- Re: Here is an old published example - mqracing 12:36:02 12/1/04 (4)
- Re: Here is an old published example - Dave Cigna 14:12:10 12/2/04 (1)
- or... - Sector-7G 14:58:52 12/2/04 (0)
- Well, you did ask for a published reference:) - Russ57 10:23:13 12/2/04 (0)
- well, I'll just add him to the list... - Sector-7G 12:47:45 12/1/04 (0)
- since you want it out in the open... - Sector-7G 09:33:05 12/1/04 (0)
- maybe you won't get it.... - Sector-7G 09:21:25 12/1/04 (6)
- or, if you find Crowhurst too confusing or complex.... - mqracing 10:54:03 12/1/04 (3)
- you can't even compute a load line value from its slope... - Sector-7G 11:00:41 12/1/04 (2)
- go for it Dougie.... - mqracing 12:21:41 12/1/04 (1)
- thank you Mike... - Sector-7G 06:17:03 12/2/04 (0)
- keep reading dougie.... - mqracing 10:52:00 12/1/04 (1)
- why? - Sector-7G 09:11:51 12/2/04 (0)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Damir_the real one 23:08:35 11/30/04 (1)
- Now this I like a lot.....great explanation...thanks(nt) - Russ57 07:22:38 12/1/04 (0)