In Reply to: RE: "RE: according to this they are the same thing...." That is not what that article says. posted by vinnie2 on May 4, 2019 at 09:46:41:
Vinnie, this pseudo-SRPP was in vogue for a good number of years, thanks mostly to designers who failed to grasp its original purpose or to understand how it functions. When this circuit is applied as a totem pole, rather than SRPP, the two-tube arrangement serves no useful purpose. It can be replaced with a single tube, which will both reduce distortion and enable greater maximum voltage swing. You've been warned. :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "RE: according to this they are the same thing...." That is not what that article says. - Triode_Kingdom 05/4/1922:45:48 05/4/19 (5)
- RE: "RE: according to this they are the same thing...." That is not what that article says. - deafbykhorns 16:31:13 05/5/19 (0)
- RE: "RE: according to this they are the same thing...." That is not what that article says. - vinnie2 02:51:39 05/5/19 (3)
- RE: "RE: according to this they are the same thing...." That is not what that article says. - Triode_Kingdom 19:28:31 05/5/19 (2)
- RE: "RE: according to this they are the same thing...." That is not what that article says. - vinnie2 08:26:59 05/6/19 (1)
- RE: "RE: according to this they are the same thing...." That is not what that article says. - Triode_Kingdom 20:02:17 05/6/19 (0)