In Reply to: RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels posted by J.L on October 4, 2007 at 06:45:16:
Minidisc is very neat - I have one - a Sony 930 series. Atrac 5.0. I really wanted a 555ES and couldn't afford it at the time in 2001. I admit, its outrageously cute and better by miles than any data reduced MP3, 2/4, or the MSoft one - better than them all with the one exception of DCC. I have a Philips DCC 600 and that is subtlety better again - but of course much less sexy and much less convenient. But genuine lossless (don't mention Apple or Meridian) - i.e. pure analogue wins the day. Smooth extended highs, no grittiness, seamless integration of frequencies, no vagueing out on busy passages (even DCC and the best of mini-disc does this and as for lossy anything, they are unlistenable even at 192kHz). Also bear in mind that mini-disc truncates frequencies below 20hz and above 16kHz - yes I know your spec manual says that the frequency response is from 2hz and up to 22khz - the machines circuitry may indeed perform on those parameters - the media and ATRAC coding doesn't. Not a chance – no space. PASC is slightly better with an 18 bit word and 18kHz upper threshold.
3dB, if you're still there, I listen to tapes because they offer superior recording - I don't much like CD recording. Media is sometimes a reliability hassle and odd order distortion rises as dither, clocking and other errors are successively re-approximated by the error correction chipware. This is aggravated if using yellow and orange (RW) book devices instead of red book machines working in real time.
And analogue is more fun. Recording on them, which I do often, is rewarding. I copy to CD for friends and relations who are unfortunate enough not to have a cassette deck or place instant track access above sonic quality.
Cheers all - MH
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - MHugo 10/6/0713:30:46 10/6/07 (13)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - danielaclark2003@yahoo.com 03:00:05 10/8/07 (12)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - MHugo 07:41:10 10/11/07 (0)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - RWF 12:48:34 10/10/07 (10)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - MHugo 07:47:46 10/11/07 (9)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - RWF 08:11:48 10/11/07 (8)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - MHugo 09:50:28 10/11/07 (7)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - RWF 10:25:55 10/11/07 (0)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - RWF 10:20:05 10/11/07 (5)
- RE: why the interest in cassette decks and reel to reels - Mercury Boy 03:54:55 10/22/07 (4)
- I have a few Telarc pre-recordeds on TDK SA, even better are the Telarcs on TDK Metal by Nakamichi Reference - Teresa 19:32:35 10/22/07 (3)
- RE: I have a few Telarc pre-recordeds on TDK SA, even better are the Telarcs on TDK Metal by Nakamichi Reference - Mercury Boy 19:56:37 10/22/07 (2)
- RE: I have a few Telarc pre-recordeds on TDK SA, even better are the Telarcs on TDK Metal by Nakamichi Reference - Mercury Boy 20:14:48 10/22/07 (1)
- Thanks I'm glad you enjoyed it! (;-) NT - Teresa 22:28:31 10/22/07 (0)