|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
|
|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Why not acoustic suspension for..... posted by DaveV on February 25, 2020 at 09:44:19:
Fiberglass has nothing to do with acoustic suspension. All acoustic suspension speakers are closed boxes. The reverse is not true. Many closed boxes are not acoustic suspension. A good old example of closed box but not acoustic suspension is Bozak. I don't know if Magico and YG are acoustic suspension but they are among the few closed boxes today.
Thiel/Small analysis killed acoustic suspension. It allowed accurate ported designs. Porting is more efficient and more importantly it sounds bassier which is good for sales although the best ported design will never bea bass controlled as the best closed box.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why not acoustic suspension for..... - hahax@verizon.net 02/25/2020:59:04 02/25/20 (6)
- this is wrong on the filled part - Story 02:39:28 02/26/20 (5)
- RE: this is wrong on the filled part - hahax@verizon.net 20:43:47 02/26/20 (0)
- If you read the patent(s) for the "acoustic suspension" design... - Steve O 05:43:43 02/26/20 (3)
- Where do you see that in the patent? - Dave_K 06:38:59 02/26/20 (2)
- You're correct, it's not specifically in that document... - Steve O 08:55:26 02/26/20 (1)
- RE: You're correct, it's not specifically in that document... - Inmate51 10:40:14 02/27/20 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
