In Reply to: My tastes in sound seem to be virtually identical to yours. posted by jsm on February 7, 2006 at 12:57:18:
" I thought the [Harbeth Monitor] 40s had a glorious midrange, but were a bit bright and analytical for me."They are not a bright, analytical speaker, so as you suggest, the electronics may have been at fault. They are absolutely neutral through the entire midrange, honest to a fault, thanks to their very highly resolving midrange driver; and they have a gorgeous high end, thanks to one of the best tweeters in the world. They ARE monitors. They do tell us what's in the recording. But they haven't the cold, stern quality associated with truly analytical speakers. We may be arguing here over what "analytical" means in audio, but I think it is generally considered a pejorative term, referring to a recognizable coolness. Harbeths do tend to sound objective compared to Spendors and Harbeths, but at the risk of quibbling, I hate to see the word "analytical" applied to them.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: My tastes in sound seem to be virtually identical to yours. - Bob Neill 02/7/0614:10:58 02/7/06 (12)
- Re: My tastes in sound seem to be virtually identical to yours. - jsm 16:24:06 02/7/06 (11)
- Re: My tastes in sound seem to be virtually identical to yours. - Bob Neill 18:52:28 02/7/06 (1)
- Re: My tastes in sound seem to be virtually identical to yours. - jsm 20:10:59 02/7/06 (0)
- Are you sure you heard the 40's? - PabloP 16:57:49 02/7/06 (8)
- Re: Are you sure you heard the 40's? - Paul Tobin 18:05:20 02/9/06 (0)
- Re: Are you sure you heard the 40's? - jsm 20:23:03 02/7/06 (3)
- The bass - PabloP 06:48:09 02/8/06 (2)
- I'm not sure I believe that. - jsm 11:21:23 02/8/06 (0)
- Re: The bass - Bob Neill 09:16:55 02/8/06 (0)
- "Too much tweeter" - Rajesh 17:44:47 02/7/06 (2)
- That's the way I hear them, and - PabloP 18:23:30 02/7/06 (1)
- Re: That's the way I hear them, and - Rajesh 10:04:16 02/8/06 (0)