In Reply to: Re: You forgot one. posted by Steve Jewell on August 3, 1999 at 08:35:19:
Here is the full post from which I originally only quoted for reasons of conciseness:#####################################################
Posted by steve Jewell on July 31, 1999 at 18:45:04:
In Reply to: First point... posted by Phil Sieg on July 30, 1999 at 19:14:17:
I see clearly now the level of competency at work here. I have not been recruited by anyone. When a friend of mine (And Vlad is my friend) has his integrity questioned as well as one of the products he is most emphatically enthusiastic about I will throw in my two coppers. Its clear that as a DIY'er that what you have constructed as your playback equipment is so poor that even a Pioneer receiver bought from Montgomerey Wards 10 years ago can outperform it (Yes, I have for the sake of arguement tried it with amazingly decent results) than you are not to be taken seriously! I will not re-state the facts about what I believe is one of the finest speakers I have heard. Enjoy your tinkering but stay out of the recommendation business, you have no ground to stand on.
#############################################################
I shall leave this without any further comment (not that it needs one).....
Ciao Thorsten
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Out of context? Okay, have the context..... - Thorsten 08/3/9909:22:04 08/3/99 (7)
- Re: Out of context? Okay, have the context..... - steve jewell 12:31:54 08/3/99 (6)
- Re: Out of context? Okay, have the context..... - Thorsten 13:32:24 08/3/99 (1)
- Re: Out of context? Okay, have the context..... - steve j 18:53:30 08/3/99 (0)
- Re: Out of context? Okay, have the context..... - Chris S. 13:16:46 08/3/99 (0)
- *rolling eyes* - Jack G 12:54:02 08/3/99 (0)
- Re: Okay, have the context..... - Stephæn 12:45:19 08/3/99 (1)
- Re: Okay, have the context..... - steve J 18:56:53 08/3/99 (0)