In Reply to: Ou, just listening to background music ? How Quad II-forty - enough high definition to serious listening? (nt) posted by Tawe on February 20, 2006 at 15:08:04:
Actually having owned Quad II's and various other tube amps inc ARC, EAR,and some French exotics I can honestly say that Quad II's produce a not unpleasant "antique" kind of sound, somewhat soft but with a nice bloom. I am not knocking them but I'm sure that the Tannoys would grace something a little better, something single ended perhaps. The other post recommending the new Quads is right on the money. The original stereo Quad control unit that matched the II's is a museum piece I'm afraid- delightful aesthetics but I have never heard a fuzzy stereo image float around the room in different directions like that before or since. Search and avoid.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Ou, just listening to background music ? How Quad II-forty - enough high definition to serious listening? (nt) - The Decameron 02/22/0613:21:34 02/22/06 (1)
- What you think about these SE monoblocks? - Tawe 23:27:15 02/22/06 (0)