RE: The old passive vs active controversy

SET Asylum

Single Ended Triodes (SETs), the ultimate tube lovers dream.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - If an SET amp puts out 2 watts/ch ... How many watts would it put out with a preamp front in ? - drummerwill 07:36:18 08/24/13 (38)

Thanks guys for the enlighten thoughts..... - drummerwill 12:43:44 08/31/13 (0)

RE: If an SET amp puts out 2 watts/ch ... How many watts would it put out with a preamp front in ? - xaudiomanx 17:23:19 08/29/13 (1)

RE: If an SET amp puts out 2 watts/ch ... How many watts would it put out with a preamp front in ? - najo49 07:00:49 09/10/13 (0)

Why have a preamp? - VoltSecond 21:51:55 08/26/13 (0)

RE: If an SET amp puts out 2 watts/ch ... How many watts would it put out with a preamp front in ? - gusser 13:40:13 08/25/13 (0)

RE: If an SET amp puts out 2 watts/ch ... How many watts would it put out with a preamp front in ? - Todd Krieger 16:26:07 08/24/13 (0)

2 watts/ch ... nt - Paul Joppa 11:14:01 08/24/13 (31)

RE: 2 watts/ch ... nt....Help me out Paul,, - drummerwill 14:11:48 08/24/13 (30)

Not to be picky but ... - Naz 07:57:46 08/31/13 (0)

RE: 2 watts/ch ... nt....Help me out Paul,, - Paul Joppa 14:24:12 08/24/13 (28)

RE: 2 watts/ch ... nt....Help me out Paul,, - drummerwill 21:05:23 08/24/13 (27)

RE: 2 watts/ch ... nt....Help me out Paul,, - Paul Joppa 10:10:56 08/26/13 (0)

RE: 2 watts/ch ... nt....Help me out Paul,, - Todd Krieger 23:01:58 08/25/13 (1)

RE: Kool Todd ..... - drummerwill 08:27:52 08/27/13 (0)

The old passive vs active controversy - Salectric 07:45:15 08/25/13 (20)

Agreed, this has been my experience.~nT - Cleantimestream 04:28:54 08/28/13 (0)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Tre' 08:11:18 08/25/13 (17)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Stuben 08/29/1309:01:22 08/29/13 (11)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Tre' 11:54:52 08/29/13 (10)

Not that simple - Salectric 12:18:19 08/31/13 (9)

RE: Not that simple - Donald North 23:14:00 09/3/13 (0)

RE: Not that simple - Tre' 13:10:58 08/31/13 (7)

RE: Not that simple - Salectric 18:17:28 08/31/13 (6)

RE: Not that simple - charles1dad 06:45:02 09/1/13 (5)

RE: Not that simple - Tre' 08:02:51 09/1/13 (4)

RE: Not that simple - charles1dad 10:22:03 09/1/13 (3)

RE: Not that simple - Tre' 10:47:23 09/1/13 (2)

RE: Not that simple - Caucasian Blackplate 10:40:29 09/3/13 (0)

RE: Not that simple - charles1dad 13:28:47 09/1/13 (0)

The less efficient the speaker, the less apparent the shortcoming of passive... I do not know why~nT - Cleantimestream 04:30:45 08/28/13 (0)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - drummerwill 08:46:59 08/27/13 (3)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Gerry E. 18:39:48 08/29/13 (2)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Abacus Music 21:44:16 12/29/13 (0)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Tre' 21:32:00 08/29/13 (0)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - charles1dad 08:02:14 08/25/13 (0)

It will play louder, but - Frihed89 23:45:18 08/24/13 (2)

RE: It will play louder, but - drummerwill 10:55:44 08/25/13 (1)

RE: It will play louder, but - Frihed89 13:27:55 08/25/13 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Stuben 08/29/1309:01:22 08/29/13 (11)

RE: The old passive vs active controversy - Tre' 11:54:52 08/29/13 (10)

Not that simple - Salectric 12:18:19 08/31/13 (9)

RE: Not that simple - Donald North 23:14:00 09/3/13 (0)

RE: Not that simple - Tre' 13:10:58 08/31/13 (7)

RE: Not that simple - Salectric 18:17:28 08/31/13 (6)

RE: Not that simple - charles1dad 06:45:02 09/1/13 (5)

RE: Not that simple - Tre' 08:02:51 09/1/13 (4)

RE: Not that simple - charles1dad 10:22:03 09/1/13 (3)

RE: Not that simple - Tre' 10:47:23 09/1/13 (2)

RE: Not that simple - Caucasian Blackplate 10:40:29 09/3/13 (0)

RE: Not that simple - charles1dad 13:28:47 09/1/13 (0)

Post a Message!