In Reply to: RE: I kind of like to use the proper tool for a job. posted by Tre' on June 28, 2008 at 20:47:30:
It would be very interesting to compare this approach with either:
a) well-executed parafeed, or
b) a SE OPT with minimal air-gap due to utilizing current-cancellation in the secondary.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- it would be interesting... - Jim Dowdy 06/29/0817:29:42 06/29/08 (17)
- RE: it would be interesting... - Tre' 08:49:38 06/30/08 (16)
- current-canceling OPT - Jim Dowdy 09:18:08 06/30/08 (15)
- RE: current-canceling OPT - Tre' 11:20:26 06/30/08 (14)
- RE: current-canceling OPT- hysteresis loss? - Ralph 14:57:50 06/30/08 (13)
- RE: current-canceling OPT- hysteresis loss? - Tre' 19:04:25 06/30/08 (12)
- hysteresis losses - Jim Dowdy 06:57:22 07/1/08 (11)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Ralph 09:42:10 07/1/08 (10)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Tre' 10:11:54 07/1/08 (9)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Ralph 11:21:48 07/1/08 (8)
- yes. - PakProtector 13:12:38 07/5/08 (0)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Tre' 12:58:56 07/1/08 (6)
- RE: hysteresis losses - PakProtector 13:42:57 07/5/08 (0)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Donald North 22:01:40 07/1/08 (0)
- Solve one problem-- - Ralph 13:12:03 07/1/08 (3)
- RE: Solve one problem-- - Tre' 13:24:55 07/1/08 (2)
- I'm sure that is perspective - Ralph 13:45:43 07/1/08 (1)
- RE: I'm sure that is perspective - Tre' 14:39:55 07/1/08 (0)