In Reply to: RE: hysteresis losses posted by Ralph on July 1, 2008 at 11:21:48:
No, you're not missing anything now.The hysteresis loss is probably greater once you reverse the field.
But even when you don't reverse the field you still have hysteresis losses.
What I'm trying to get away from is the lack of frequency extension caused by the gap in a SE transformer.
P.S. It's interesting how many SET'ers are going parafeed. With parafeed one would have the same zero crossing losses as with push pull.
I think it's all about trade offs.Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: hysteresis losses - Tre' 07/1/0812:58:56 07/1/08 (6)
- RE: hysteresis losses - PakProtector 13:42:57 07/5/08 (0)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Donald North 22:01:40 07/1/08 (0)
- Solve one problem-- - Ralph 13:12:03 07/1/08 (3)
- RE: Solve one problem-- - Tre' 13:24:55 07/1/08 (2)
- I'm sure that is perspective - Ralph 13:45:43 07/1/08 (1)
- RE: I'm sure that is perspective - Tre' 14:39:55 07/1/08 (0)