In Reply to: it would be interesting... posted by Jim Dowdy on June 29, 2008 at 17:29:42:
"a SE OPT with minimal air-gap due to utilizing current-cancellation in the secondary. "
Can you describe this circuit for me?
Thanks, Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: it would be interesting... - Tre' 06/30/0808:49:38 06/30/08 (16)
- current-canceling OPT - Jim Dowdy 09:18:08 06/30/08 (15)
- RE: current-canceling OPT - Tre' 11:20:26 06/30/08 (14)
- RE: current-canceling OPT- hysteresis loss? - Ralph 14:57:50 06/30/08 (13)
- RE: current-canceling OPT- hysteresis loss? - Tre' 19:04:25 06/30/08 (12)
- hysteresis losses - Jim Dowdy 06:57:22 07/1/08 (11)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Ralph 09:42:10 07/1/08 (10)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Tre' 10:11:54 07/1/08 (9)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Ralph 11:21:48 07/1/08 (8)
- yes. - PakProtector 13:12:38 07/5/08 (0)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Tre' 12:58:56 07/1/08 (6)
- RE: hysteresis losses - PakProtector 13:42:57 07/5/08 (0)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Donald North 22:01:40 07/1/08 (0)
- Solve one problem-- - Ralph 13:12:03 07/1/08 (3)
- RE: Solve one problem-- - Tre' 13:24:55 07/1/08 (2)
- I'm sure that is perspective - Ralph 13:45:43 07/1/08 (1)
- RE: I'm sure that is perspective - Tre' 14:39:55 07/1/08 (0)