![]()
comments?
Thanks, Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - schematic - Tre' 10:44:36 06/28/08 (41)
- RE: schematic - Michael Koster 08:00:05 07/23/08 (0)
- RE: schematic - Stuben 16:10:03 07/2/08 (0)
- RE: schematic - Paul Joppa 22:42:59 06/29/08 (2)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 13:36:53 07/16/08 (1)
- RE: schematic - Paul Joppa 17:18:00 07/23/08 (0)
- RE: schematic - Caucasian Blackplate 12:51:26 06/29/08 (3)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 15:44:48 06/29/08 (2)
- RE: schematic - Caucasian Blackplate 16:10:43 06/29/08 (1)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 16:26:54 06/29/08 (0)
- A "push no pull" amplifier? - Ivan303 14:10:10 06/28/08 (9)
- RE: A "push no pull" amplifier? - Tre' 20:04:49 06/28/08 (8)
- How close DC balance of the CCS have to be... - Ivan303 20:20:03 06/28/08 (7)
- What model Eico? (nt) - SomeJoe 03:28:58 06/29/08 (4)
- HF-81... - Ivan303 07:02:39 06/29/08 (3)
- RE: HF-81... - drlowmu 15:35:23 07/12/08 (2)
- RE: HF-81... - kevinkr 10:27:36 07/16/08 (1)
- RE: HF-81... - drlowmu 14:41:14 07/18/08 (0)
- RE: How close DC balance of the CCS have to be... - Tre' 20:42:57 06/28/08 (1)
- RE: How close DC balance of the CCS have to be... - kevinkr 10:30:18 07/16/08 (0)
- RE: schematic - nc 12:44:17 06/28/08 (21)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 20:03:43 06/28/08 (20)
- I kind of like to use the proper tool for a job. - nc 20:12:02 06/28/08 (19)
- RE: I kind of like to use the proper tool for a job. - Tre' 20:47:30 06/28/08 (18)
- it would be interesting... - Jim Dowdy 17:29:42 06/29/08 (17)
- RE: it would be interesting... - Tre' 08:49:38 06/30/08 (16)
- current-canceling OPT - Jim Dowdy 09:18:08 06/30/08 (15)
- RE: current-canceling OPT - Tre' 11:20:26 06/30/08 (14)
- RE: current-canceling OPT- hysteresis loss? - Ralph 14:57:50 06/30/08 (13)
- RE: current-canceling OPT- hysteresis loss? - Tre' 19:04:25 06/30/08 (12)
- hysteresis losses - Jim Dowdy 06:57:22 07/1/08 (11)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Ralph 09:42:10 07/1/08 (10)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Tre' 10:11:54 07/1/08 (9)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Ralph 11:21:48 07/1/08 (8)
- yes. - PakProtector 13:12:38 07/5/08 (0)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Tre' 12:58:56 07/1/08 (6)
- RE: hysteresis losses - PakProtector 13:42:57 07/5/08 (0)
- RE: hysteresis losses - Donald North 22:01:40 07/1/08 (0)
- Solve one problem-- - Ralph 13:12:03 07/1/08 (3)
- RE: Solve one problem-- - Tre' 13:24:55 07/1/08 (2)
- I'm sure that is perspective - Ralph 13:45:43 07/1/08 (1)
- RE: I'm sure that is perspective - Tre' 14:39:55 07/1/08 (0)