In Reply to: RE: is a vacuum posted by Gerry E. on April 5, 2010 at 04:55:10:
I wanted to say, "yes", but, I think once you've entered the category of very linear, subtle imperfections may be preferred over other subtle imperfections. Also, some may become used to a certain exaggeration (non-linearity) and when it is "improved" (made more linear) think something is "missing". Seriously. This takes careful comparisons to detect, as well as a musician's understanding of music or close.
Loading can make a very audible difference in my experience, which is why I suggested advanced versions as a possible way to "go beyond". I meant to suggest in my previous response to CCS load BOTH the driver and the output. I plan to do this myself, using a 45, and will report when finished.
And to contradict myself, I found 10's to be a very honest and clean sounding tube, though NOT technically as linear as a 45. I didn't say "sounded better", nor would I say, "sounded worse". Because I don't need any more gain than a mu 20 driving a mu 3 (60), I also plan to try a 10 (mu 8) driving another 10 (64) which should have a similar overall gain.
"Maybe" 2 x DHT's will have something that IDHT x DHT doesn't. ? We'll see.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: is a vacuum - bobbyj 04/5/1010:28:41 04/5/10 (3)
- DHPentode driving 45 is very good... - Minussss3db 13:48:18 04/7/10 (2)
- Which DHP would you recommend? - SomeJoe 03:10:39 04/9/10 (1)
- Which DHP would you recommend? 47 is great... - Minussss3db 13:02:22 04/9/10 (0)