In Reply to: Re: A comparison of two 6sn7 circuits. posted by GEO on September 5, 2004 at 14:51:21:
"Your reasoning may make some sense if you can isolate all sets of variables and then conclude that using a 6sn7 under the "fi" versus the "srpp", that the Fi is preferable".That's what I basically did. all variables were controlled at least in this circumstance. Perhaps some change in the variables may have altered the circumstances significantly enough to draw a different conclusion, but it just doesn't seem likely. The differences between the two are flagrant.
What strikes me is that at least in this circumstance, the fi primer is so much better, it is so full of magic, that this should be something that should have been shouted about.
By the way, I think I'm using the fi primer label as a misnomer. Apparently, according to JoHn, it is the VTV circuit whcih is a variant of the fi primer.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: A comparison of two 6sn7 circuits. - njjohn 09/5/0415:59:09 09/5/04 (21)
- Re: A comparison of two 6sn7 circuits. - GEO 16:15:20 09/5/04 (20)
- Hey GEO - Jack G 11:48:55 09/6/04 (3)
- Generalizations - paul_s 13:26:10 09/6/04 (0)
- Re: Hey GEO - GEO 12:13:49 09/6/04 (1)
- Re: Hey GEO - njjohn 17:45:48 09/6/04 (0)
- interesting - njjohn 18:53:05 09/5/04 (15)
- DO never met a tube - paul_s 13:30:20 09/6/04 (0)
- BTW - GEO 06:01:38 09/6/04 (12)
- my love affair with websters. - njjohn 07:38:47 09/6/04 (0)
- Re: BTW - njjohn 06:54:09 09/6/04 (9)
- Re: BTW - GEO 08:01:03 09/6/04 (8)
- know emotion in audio - njjohn 09:04:22 09/6/04 (5)
- Re: know emotion in audio - GEO 10:00:49 09/6/04 (4)
- backyard and audio jungle - njjohn 11:16:49 09/6/04 (3)
- Re: backyard and audio jungle - GEO 12:03:08 09/6/04 (2)
- Re: backyard and audio jungle - GEO 18:39:23 09/6/04 (0)
- Re: backyard and audio jungle - njjohn 17:49:28 09/6/04 (0)
- websters and 45's - nk2j 08:19:41 09/6/04 (1)
- Re: websters and 45's - GEO 09:53:01 09/6/04 (0)
- Re: BTW - Robert H. 06:25:34 09/6/04 (0)
- Re: interesting - GEO 05:50:49 09/6/04 (0)