In Reply to: Re: PP Iron for SE - repost of a 1996 rec.audio.tubes by "Paul".... posted by Steve Eddy on February 20, 2004 at 12:59:10:
you are completely missing my point.when we (at least me) refer to linear perm, it is in reference to it being the same value wrt AC excitation any derivation from that is a nonlinearity. fabricate two inductors based on the curves one at h=0 the other at H=10.
now use these inductors to form a simple LR divider. which one will more closely follow what an ideal (linear) inductance will give?
to me what i consider linear perm is the same as linear inductance, a situaiton where the value does not change with applied voltage or frequency...
dave
dave
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: PP Iron for SE - repost of a 1996 rec.audio.tubes by "Paul".... - dave slagle 02/20/0413:22:53 02/20/04 (4)
- Re: PP Iron for SE - repost of a 1996 rec.audio.tubes by "Paul".... - Steve Eddy 14:55:07 02/20/04 (3)
- Re: PP Iron for SE - repost of a 1996 rec.audio.tubes by "Paul".... - dave slagle 18:39:09 02/20/04 (2)
- Re: PP Iron for SE - repost of a 1996 rec.audio.tubes by "Paul".... - Steve Eddy 20:12:29 02/20/04 (1)
- Re: PP Iron for SE - repost of a 1996 rec.audio.tubes by "Paul".... - dave slagle 22:39:31 02/20/04 (0)