In Reply to: RE: What's your methodolgy and how is it based in reality? posted by Pat D on January 30, 2009 at 20:22:21:
Questions have various purposes, for example:
(1) to elicit information from the responder,
(2) to communicate information to the responder,
(3) to stimulate thought in the responder,
(4) to provide entertainment to all present.
Since we are not on the same page, there is little point continuing this non-Socratic dialog. I will have to live with my disappointment in failing to attain enlightenment regarding the nature of reality as seen from your particular materialistic viewpoint.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What's your methodolgy and how is it based in reality? - Tony Lauck 01/31/0906:59:42 01/31/09 (31)
- RE: What's your methodolgy and how is it based in reality? - Pat D 10:45:36 01/31/09 (30)
- Try Dialectic Materialism. That one fits you a bit. (nt) - robert young 15:22:28 01/31/09 (29)
- RE: Dielectric materials. - rick_m 09:30:29 02/1/09 (9)
- That's pretty clever, though Wikipedia came up with it first . . . - Pat D 19:17:35 02/2/09 (3)
- You really are... - robert young 06:59:51 02/3/09 (2)
- RE: You really are... - Pat D 09:54:59 02/3/09 (1)
- very true. - robert young 09:57:57 02/3/09 (0)
- Glad you (nearly) got the joke. - robert young 10:36:39 02/1/09 (4)
- Couldn't resist the obvious pun... - rick_m 19:20:21 02/1/09 (2)
- RE: Couldn't resist the obvious pun... - robert young 04:04:49 02/2/09 (1)
- RE: Couldn't resist the obvious pun... - rick_m 07:42:29 02/2/09 (0)
- Tres amusant. nt - geoffkait 10:47:13 02/1/09 (0)
- LOL--that's really funny! - Pat D 17:09:34 01/31/09 (18)
- RE: LOL--that's really funny! - robert young 07:30:44 02/1/09 (17)
- RE: LOL--that's really funny! - Pat D 10:31:53 02/1/09 (16)
- RE: LOL--that's really funny! - robert young 10:54:01 02/1/09 (15)
- RE: LOL--that's really funny! - Pat D 12:32:01 02/1/09 (14)
- You seem to have lost track of the thread. - robert young 15:08:00 02/1/09 (13)
- I can only go by what you say . . . - Pat D 16:58:47 02/1/09 (12)
- Focus, Pat, focus.... - robert young 10:28:01 02/2/09 (10)
- Well, now, you and Tony Lauck alleged I am a materialist with no evidence. - Pat D 19:14:50 02/2/09 (3)
- Just the reply I expected. - robert young 03:47:53 02/3/09 (2)
- Well, Tony at least expressed some desire for communication--you just made a clumsy attempt at a joke. (nt) - Pat D 06:47:16 02/3/09 (1)
- The joke came first and many efforts at communication with you followed. - robert young 06:56:24 02/3/09 (0)
- RE: Focus, Pat, focus.... - Tony Lauck 10:50:13 02/2/09 (5)
- Focus Tony - Pat D 22:31:31 02/4/09 (4)
- RE: Focus Tony - Tony Lauck 04:56:41 02/5/09 (3)
- RE: Focus Tony - Pat D 08:09:24 02/5/09 (2)
- RE: Focus Tony - Tony Lauck 10:22:41 02/5/09 (1)
- RE: Focus Tony - Pat D 11:18:26 02/5/09 (0)
- RE: I can only go by what you say . . . - theaudiohobby 17:13:28 02/1/09 (0)