In Reply to: Perhaps you all might agree with the conclusion more? posted by Axon on September 11, 2007 at 21:49:26:
Good try, no cigar. While I can't name everyonehere who might be a member, try:
Charles Hanson
John Atkinson
John Curl
and
clark, Life Member, AES
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "I guess nobody here... has AES membership." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 09/12/0709:38:16 09/12/07 (89)
- Touché. I'm just a little surprised at... - Axon 22:45:50 09/12/07 (88)
- I confess that I'm confused - E-Stat 15:53:34 09/13/07 (74)
- No contradiction, but I may have confused you - Axon 21:50:45 09/13/07 (72)
- RE: No contradiction, but I may have confused you - Dan Banquer 06:45:22 09/14/07 (2)
- RE: No contradiction, but I may have confused you - krabapple 09:36:17 09/20/07 (1)
- RE: No contradiction, but I may have confused you - Dan Banquer 09:58:00 09/20/07 (0)
- Convenient assumption - E-Stat 06:33:53 09/14/07 (51)
- you got me. I need to retake logic 101. Round 3: - Axon 08:14:16 09/14/07 (50)
- With any kind of test - E-Stat 08:36:48 09/14/07 (49)
- you're really struggling here - truthseekerprime 07:01:48 09/16/07 (48)
- "Demonstrated that FOR THE SAME RECORDING reducing the resolution did not have an audible effect." NO! - clarkjohnsen 10:49:26 09/17/07 (34)
- RE: That clears up a lot! - EBradMeyer 21:24:25 09/21/07 (33)
- "A CD would have sounded the same." Good to know, but bland assertions are not proof. Besides... - clarkjohnsen 08:42:46 09/22/07 (32)
- RE: "Memory Player that produces a sonic result superior to any other" - tlyyra 08:49:21 09/24/07 (0)
- RE: That clears up a lot! - EBradMeyer 07:01:54 09/23/07 (19)
- "I give you The Church of the Latter Day Saints." So that's what it's going to be, is it? - clarkjohnsen 08:54:32 09/24/07 (18)
- RE: "I give you The Church of the Latter Day Saints." So that's what it's going to be, is it? - EBradMeyer 14:18:08 09/24/07 (1)
- "The device we were using is a recording system, which passes a signal *through* it." Oh. - clarkjohnsen 10:13:34 09/25/07 (0)
- RE: "I give you The Church of the Latter Day Saints." So that's what it's going to be, is it? - EBradMeyer 13:53:30 09/24/07 (15)
- "It's not up to me to prove reviewers can't hear the huge differences." LOL! You made the assertion... - clarkjohnsen 09:59:20 09/25/07 (8)
- Still bullshitting? - tlyyra 10:21:25 09/26/07 (2)
- I be happy you continue to delude yourself. Couldn't happen to a more appropriate guy. - clarkjohnsen 11:22:48 09/28/07 (1)
- Done that - tlyyra 10:05:26 09/29/07 (0)
- RE: "It's not up to me, etc." - EBradMeyer 11:28:48 09/25/07 (4)
- "They're... way to risky for you." Oh geez, puh-leeze. - clarkjohnsen 09:16:22 09/26/07 (0)
- You're correct - it has been demonstrated. Don't bother arguing with him; it's an utter waste of time. /nt - truthseekerprime 20:01:22 09/25/07 (2)
- "It has been demonstrated" all right... that it's "a crock". That's if you pay any attention to... - clarkjohnsen 09:24:08 09/26/07 (0)
- RE: You're correct etc. - EBradMeyer 07:32:26 09/26/07 (0)
- Complettely OT - ABXing absolute polarity - Axon 22:32:57 09/24/07 (5)
- RE: Complettely OT - ABXing absolute polarity - EBradMeyer 01:33:16 09/25/07 (4)
- You underestimate the thickness of my skull - Axon 05:52:32 09/25/07 (3)
- RE: You underestimate the thickness of my skull - EBradMeyer 11:33:53 09/25/07 (2)
- No pain, no gain! - Axon 16:54:20 09/26/07 (1)
- RE: No pain, no gain! - EBradMeyer 07:40:47 09/27/07 (0)
- RE: "A CD would have sounded the same." Good to know, but bland assertions are not proof. Besides... - krabapple 16:24:39 09/22/07 (1)
- AA posts as "uncontradicted evidence" - tlyyra 03:30:22 09/23/07 (0)
- You're right Clark, but that's not the point. - rick_m 12:34:04 09/22/07 (8)
- Thank you. But even "going astray", while that does happen, is not the core of my argument. - clarkjohnsen 11:09:23 09/23/07 (7)
- RE: Thank you. But even "going astray", while that does happen, is not the core of my argument. - rick_m 13:09:12 09/23/07 (6)
- "They have eliminated [CD playback] as a variable," True; but then they try to tell us... - clarkjohnsen 08:26:14 09/24/07 (5)
- Having now read it... - rick_m 09:07:04 09/25/07 (1)
- "I wasn't missing much." Indeed not. Yet I got challenged for calling it a quick read! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:02:59 09/25/07 (0)
- OK,Ok,ok - rick_m 09:14:13 09/24/07 (2)
- This URL may get you to it. - clarkjohnsen 09:33:57 09/24/07 (1)
- Excellent, thanks! nt - rick_m 09:46:55 09/24/07 (0)
- Struggling for what? - E-Stat 09:11:00 09/16/07 (12)
- (See my post above.) nt - clarkjohnsen 10:50:12 09/17/07 (0)
- I guess basic reading comprehension - truthseekerprime 13:19:50 09/16/07 (10)
- So, professor - E-Stat 17:56:52 09/16/07 (9)
- "Our test results indicate that all of these recordings could be released on conventional CDs... - truthseekerprime 20:28:50 09/16/07 (8)
- Anecdotally, I think it may be true. - rick_m 10:17:47 09/20/07 (0)
- As have I - E-Stat 21:23:00 09/16/07 (6)
- RE: As have I - krabapple 09:43:44 09/20/07 (5)
- The common term for your explanation - E-Stat 09:56:29 09/20/07 (4)
- RE: The common term for your explanation - krabapple 16:19:26 09/22/07 (1)
- There is a difference - E-Stat 09:01:51 09/23/07 (0)
- A whole lot o' speculatin' goin' on in the paper too. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:05:42 09/22/07 (1)
- In stark contrast to your pamphlet that was so convincingly argued that you had to pay for it to get printed? - tlyyra 03:33:55 09/23/07 (0)
- Hmmm, that's certainly an illogical conclusion - Ted Smith 22:08:08 09/13/07 (16)
- Provably wrong - Axon 08:05:00 09/14/07 (15)
- Baloney - Ted Smith 08:45:36 09/14/07 (14)
- RE: Baloney - krabapple 09:57:13 09/20/07 (10)
- RE: Baloney - Ted Smith 11:17:21 09/20/07 (9)
- RE: Baloney - krabapple 16:28:51 09/22/07 (1)
- Yep, Why haven't you addressed any of the points in my posts? - Ted Smith 16:36:19 09/22/07 (0)
- So... your opinion on the JAES paper is...? nt - clarkjohnsen 09:07:52 09/22/07 (6)
- A crock? - Ted Smith 10:47:03 09/22/07 (5)
- "It shows an unbelievable degree of unsophistication." Oh I believe it all right! - clarkjohnsen 08:37:07 09/24/07 (0)
- So you read the article, then? - tlyyra 14:09:42 09/22/07 (3)
- I do believe in good science and enjoy the result of the same (including DSD) - Ted Smith 14:56:04 09/22/07 (2)
- Can you believe that guy? "Maybe I read too much into your CV." - clarkjohnsen 10:22:39 09/23/07 (1)
- RE: Can you believe that guy? "Maybe I read too much into your CV." - Ted Smith 16:55:34 09/23/07 (0)
- I'll admit I don't have enough experience with SACD/DVD-A... - Axon 12:08:52 09/14/07 (2)
- RE: I'll admit I don't have enough experience with SACD/DVD-A... - krabapple 10:02:47 09/20/07 (0)
- RE: I'll admit I don't have enough experience with SACD/DVD-A... - Ted Smith 13:46:35 09/14/07 (0)
- Perhaps a key element of the test wasn't disclosed. - Bruce Kendall 16:00:11 09/13/07 (0)
- Right. I'm not concerned about the DBT aspect, rather the really sloppy experimental procedures... - clarkjohnsen 12:07:29 09/13/07 (12)
- Yeah, I've read it. - Axon 12:36:04 09/13/07 (11)
- Your observations are mostly well-taken. Still I have concerns. - clarkjohnsen 08:22:26 09/14/07 (10)
- RE: That clears up a lot! - EBradMeyer 10:19:54 09/23/07 (0)
- RE: "what the equipment was, esp. the speakers" - tlyyra 09:36:57 09/14/07 (8)
- Are you involved in some sort of contest or something? - Bruce Kendall 12:10:19 09/14/07 (3)
- He's a bitter man, a bully, and an unworthy opponent -- misrepresentation is his only game. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:22:32 09/15/07 (1)
- Speaking of bitterness - tlyyra 12:23:57 09/15/07 (0)
- ??? - tlyyra 04:23:52 09/15/07 (0)
- Frankly, My dear... - bjh 10:55:46 09/14/07 (3)
- RE: Frankly, My dear... - tlyyra 11:56:44 09/14/07 (2)
- Toots a simple, "No, I don't want to comment" would have been entirely sufficient. - bjh 12:36:05 09/14/07 (1)
- Sorry if it was too complicated - tlyyra 04:48:17 09/15/07 (0)