In Reply to: All hypotheses are tenatively accepted. No amount of short DBTesting of ic proves anything definitively. posted by Norm on June 6, 2006 at 10:21:52:
First, it's tentatively.And the answer in science is that hypotheses are not accepted UNTIL SOMEBODY SHOWS SOME EVIDENCE.
Falsifiable evidence. Not evidence from a sighted test where one can't even establish potential falsification, too.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No, Norm "all hypotheses are tenatively accepted" is not right. - real_jj 06/7/0610:15:20 06/7/06 (13)
- Captain Kurk you are illogical. - Norm 18:13:24 06/7/06 (12)
- Sorry, again you're making up a position and attacking it. Why not read what I wrote. - real_jj 23:04:15 06/7/06 (11)
- I unfortunately did read what you wrote. You clearly don't know much, but it is not my interest to ed. you. - Norm 06:36:40 06/8/06 (10)
- You know, it's not very honest of you to agree with me, and then tell me I don't get it. - real_jj 14:18:54 06/8/06 (9)
- Furthermore - real_jj 15:10:12 06/8/06 (8)
- I am sorry you cannot read. nt - Norm 16:53:33 06/8/06 (7)
- Let's get this straight... You write something very poorly... - real_jj 17:12:30 06/8/06 (6)
- You came around to understanding what I said before you posted your nonsense. Please don't post on my posts. nt - Norm 19:53:28 06/8/06 (5)
- Which was that, a lie, or a claim you read minds? - real_jj 20:06:41 06/8/06 (4)
- At least you have now accepted that it is not logically possible to prove a hypothesis, only to reject one. - Norm 07:02:52 06/9/06 (3)
- Still you misrepresent my position - real_jj 10:32:17 06/9/06 (2)
- Go day, Pope nt - Norm 11:39:32 06/9/06 (1)
- You have a point, fella? - real_jj 12:46:54 06/9/06 (0)