In Reply to: RE: The idea that the posted by tomservo on May 25, 2012 at 12:00:30:
Get a copy of Michel Hedges Breakfast in the field and hear an early a very clear but very bright recording.
The original analog version from 1981 or the later CD copy? I have both. In this case, I think the "villain" is the minimal processing done on the recording. Your post piqued my interest because I find that overall, the original analog copy is an incredibly natural sounding recording - albeit a touch bright (an easy thing to cure). On The Happy Couple , you can so easily visualize his hands moving in his inimitable way. I've had to good fortune to see Hedges live three times before his untimely accident.
![]()
In another post, you mention the KEF Blade. I was in the Bay area earlier this year and noticed a hi-fi shop in downtown SFO nearby the Ruth's Chris where my wife and I had dinner. Since it had literally been years since I've set foot in an audio dealer, we walked over. They graciously played a couple of tracks on the Blades. As a coherency freak, I found them good in that respect. But, the apparent image size was tiny and very directional. Not my cup of tea. :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Breakfast in the Field" you say? - E-Stat 05/27/1208:28:35 05/27/12 (3)
- RE: "Breakfast in the Field" you say? - tomservo 16:31:18 05/27/12 (1)
- RE: "Breakfast in the Field" you say? - E-Stat 17:32:14 05/27/12 (0)
- RE: "Breakfast in the Field" you say? - geoffkait 08:32:28 05/27/12 (0)