In Reply to: I think my point was clear posted by Analog Scott on March 3, 2010 at 20:48:51:
You quote a snippet of a comment I made and then respond to it as if it was addressing some point of my stated position.
You seem to have forgotten the myth I am addressing is that
GOOD RECORDING QUALITY = GOOD SOUND & BAD RECORDING QUALITY = BAD SOUND
Not the topic, for your response to make sense - that recording quality doesn't effect sound quality. I've said this on any number of occasions prior to your effort to "dig deeper" and "trap me" as the other confused poster framed it - A GOOD SOUNDING RECORDING MAY BE A HIGH QUALITY RECORDING OR A LO QUALITY/FIDELITY RECORDING AND CHANGING THAT QUALITY MIGHT LIKELY CHANGE WHETHER OR NOT THE RECORDING STILL SOUNDS GOOD.
In the worst case for me the most you have done is corrected a misspeak on my part but on the other hand your willingness to quote a partial sentence in order to pounce on what clearly isn't the point I am making makes me wonder what your motivations really might be.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sure as a point it was clear too bad it has no relevance to the topic at hand! - Don Till 03/4/1007:24:14 03/4/10 (1)
- you are correct, other than directly addressing your assertion it was pretty irrelevant. nt - Analog Scott 13:06:24 03/4/10 (0)