In Reply to: "there's at least 1/2 dozen references to poor recording quality meaning bad sound." posted by E-Stat on February 27, 2010 at 08:58:15:
I'm sure you won't consider any of them conclusive or substantiative evidence but each and everyone of these plus many others more than suggest the importance of recording quality as they relate it to good sound!
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/5/57647.html
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/5/57535.html
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/5/57528.html
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/5/57515.html
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/5/57621.html
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/5/57449.html
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/5/57483.html
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Here is more than 1/2 dozen and there are even more though.. - Don Till 03/2/1019:23:21 03/2/10 (7)
- You've been posturing so long - E-Stat 05:49:47 03/3/10 (6)
- Without your legalistic posturing it's obvious you still don't get the point! - Don Till 07:01:51 03/3/10 (5)
- RE: Without your legalistic posturing it's obvious you still don't get the point! - morricab 01:54:28 03/5/10 (0)
- "sound bad because what was recorded actually sounds bad." - E-Stat 07:50:17 03/3/10 (3)
- RE: "sound bad because what was recorded actually sounds bad." - Don Till 08:26:19 03/3/10 (2)
- It all boils down to what you consider bad - E-Stat 09:01:36 03/3/10 (1)
- Bingo! - Don Till 20:56:28 03/10/10 (0)