In Reply to: Let me explain posted by E-Stat on February 24, 2010 at 20:03:35:
"You have provided ZERO substantiation, only your bizarre point of view.
Dude you pretty slow, I'm mean like real slow as if the belt is broken, but I'm going to slow down this amazingly simple topic a bit more just for you.
1.) I've provided concrete and solid examples of things which reqardless of how good they were recorded would sound BAD.
2.) I've provided examples of recordings which are by audiophile standards less than high quality recordings that sound wonderful on good audio equipment.
3.) Within these current threads numerous other audiophiles have commented that good recordings sound good and bad recording sound bad. But this is historical the position assumed by most people who consider themselves to be audiophiles. You can search the archives for other such comments, which are easy to find, AND you can search on the internet to find plenty of audiophile content supporting my contention that audiophiles believe good sound = good recording quality and bad sound = bad recording quality.
4.) There's a whole freeking industry supplying audiophile grade recordings to the industry because of the belief that high quality recordings sound better.
Now go study the above, ask your mom to help with the big words, then come back later to thank me for my patience in explaining it again to you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Let me explain - Don Till 02/27/1008:38:19 02/27/10 (0)