RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so...

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - I think I'll put a nail in this silly recording quality myth once and for all! - Don Till 16:34:22 02/19/10 (124)

RE: I think I'll put a nail in this silly recording quality myth once and for all! - Bob Neill 06:46:36 04/19/10 (0)

Hey Todd K! - Don Till 15:27:16 02/26/10 (6)

Don T - do you ever wonder whether - jult52 06:23:00 02/28/10 (3)

RE: Don T - do you ever wonder whether - Don Till 09:33:48 03/1/10 (2)

RE: Don T - do you ever wonder whether - jult52 09:42:49 03/10/10 (1)

Don T - do you ever wonder whether - Don Till 20:50:23 03/10/10 (0)

Yo........... - Todd Krieger 17:21:47 02/27/10 (1)

RE: Yo........... - Don Till 07:24:48 03/1/10 (0)

Maybe if you hadn't mixed up your metaphors - robert young 14:57:48 02/26/10 (0)

Semantic game. - Enophile 12:08:03 02/24/10 (0)

Totally agree - Dawnrazor 12:33:46 02/23/10 (3)

RE: Totally agree - Don Till 19:07:29 02/23/10 (2)

Semantics nt. - Dawnrazor 20:42:01 02/23/10 (1)

Of course but some of these distinctions are important - Don Till 08:35:46 02/24/10 (0)

On the other hand... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 12:50:56 02/22/10 (0)

Once again you mistake what YOU like to listen to with sound quality - morricab 02:59:25 02/22/10 (20)

Agreed............ - Todd Krieger 23:31:04 02/22/10 (0)

No your position is no different than that of those who claim amps/cables sound the same! - Don Till 20:23:22 02/22/10 (17)

Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Analog Scott 00:54:22 02/27/10 (11)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Don Till 04:32:00 02/27/10 (10)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Analog Scott 02/27/1006:28:42 02/27/10 (9)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Don Till 08:07:58 02/27/10 (8)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Analog Scott 08:40:47 02/27/10 (7)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Don Till 08:56:02 02/27/10 (6)

Now let's go full circle - Analog Scott 10:23:17 02/27/10 (5)

And your point is? - Don Till 19:43:06 03/2/10 (3)

I think my point was clear - Analog Scott 20:48:51 03/3/10 (2)

Sure as a point it was clear too bad it has no relevance to the topic at hand! - Don Till 07:24:14 03/4/10 (1)

you are correct, other than directly addressing your assertion it was pretty irrelevant. nt - Analog Scott 13:06:24 03/4/10 (0)

RE: Now let's go full circle - morricab 01:03:04 02/28/10 (0)

We are talking about sound quality, no? Not whether you like the music or not. - morricab 03:27:49 02/23/10 (4)

We're talking good sound. Some people can't stand the sound of Bob Dylans voice and - Don Till 06:42:43 02/23/10 (3)

Whether or not I like dylan's voice has nothing to do with sound quality!!! - morricab 15:54:02 02/23/10 (2)

Laugh as if I would agree that bag pipes sound good! - Don Till 18:51:06 02/23/10 (1)

Bagpipes can sound good...but that is not the point! - morricab 02:13:56 02/24/10 (0)

Yup!...I second that....nt - kootenay 07:51:56 02/22/10 (0)

Exactly what is the "myth" to which you speak - E-Stat 13:47:22 02/21/10 (26)

That a high quality recording = good sound! - Don Till 20:25:06 02/22/10 (25)

Ok - E-Stat 08:08:47 02/23/10 (24)

RE: Ok - Don Till 09:22:26 02/23/10 (23)

Define "sound quality" - E-Stat 09:37:21 02/23/10 (22)

You don't like his music many can't stand the sound of his singing! - Don Till 18:58:32 02/23/10 (21)

RE: You don't like his music many can't stand the sound of his singing! - morricab 06:13:21 02/24/10 (1)

No you've confused me with someone else! - Don Till 19:43:38 02/24/10 (0)

I will completely disagree - E-Stat 06:02:22 02/24/10 (18)

RE: I will completely disagree - Don Till 19:52:16 02/24/10 (17)

You are totally clueless - E-Stat 20:00:07 02/24/10 (16)

I don't drink but surely you must! - Don Till 20:10:33 02/24/10 (15)

What a bizarre conclusion! - E-Stat 07:49:12 02/25/10 (14)

I'm not surprised! - Don Till 15:22:51 02/26/10 (13)

So who says - E-Stat 15:28:34 02/26/10 (12)

RE: So who says - Don Till 04:49:06 02/27/10 (11)

Apparently, you have difficulty understanding - E-Stat 06:44:53 02/27/10 (10)

LOL! - Don Till 08:25:55 02/27/10 (9)

"there's at least 1/2 dozen references to poor recording quality meaning bad sound." - E-Stat 08:58:15 02/27/10 (8)

Here is more than 1/2 dozen and there are even more though.. - Don Till 19:23:21 03/2/10 (7)

You've been posturing so long - E-Stat 05:49:47 03/3/10 (6)

Without your legalistic posturing it's obvious you still don't get the point! - Don Till 07:01:51 03/3/10 (5)

RE: Without your legalistic posturing it's obvious you still don't get the point! - morricab 01:54:28 03/5/10 (0)

"sound bad because what was recorded actually sounds bad." - E-Stat 07:50:17 03/3/10 (3)

RE: "sound bad because what was recorded actually sounds bad." - Don Till 08:26:19 03/3/10 (2)

It all boils down to what you consider bad - E-Stat 09:01:36 03/3/10 (1)

Bingo! - Don Till 20:56:28 03/10/10 (0)

It's not a myth - Analog Scott 03:37:50 02/21/10 (38)

I disagree - Don Till 20:32:54 02/22/10 (30)

RE: I disagree - Analog Scott 22:42:20 02/26/10 (2)

RE: I disagree - Don Till 22:36:07 03/2/10 (1)

RE: I disagree - Analog Scott 00:08:03 03/6/10 (0)

RE: I disagree - morricab 03:42:02 02/23/10 (26)

This is so simple I really can't believe we are having this discussion. - Don Till 06:54:27 02/23/10 (25)

RE: This is so simple I really can't believe we are having this discussion. - Tony Lauck 08:47:07 02/23/10 (24)

RE: This is so simple I really can't believe we are having this discussion. - Don Till 19:39:16 02/23/10 (22)

I'm done. - Tony Lauck 06:06:30 02/24/10 (21)

It's not either/or... - rick_m 09:09:35 02/24/10 (0)

Why? - Don Till 08:50:41 02/24/10 (19)

Why? - E-Stat 18:32:52 02/24/10 (9)

RE: Why? - Don Till 19:27:22 02/24/10 (8)

RE: Why? - morricab 02:23:33 02/25/10 (3)

Why do you continue on to insist? - Don Till 05:19:36 02/27/10 (2)

RE: Why do you continue on to insist? - morricab 01:10:33 02/28/10 (1)

RE: Why do you continue on to insist? - Analog Scott 06:24:48 02/28/10 (0)

Whatever - E-Stat 19:42:12 02/24/10 (3)

RE: Whatever - Don Till 19:55:53 02/24/10 (2)

Let me explain - E-Stat 20:03:35 02/24/10 (1)

RE: Let me explain - Don Till 08:38:19 02/27/10 (0)

RE: Why? - morricab 09:00:33 02/24/10 (8)

RE: Why? - Don Till 20:07:02 02/24/10 (7)

RE: Why? - morricab 02:28:35 02/25/10 (6)

Now Morricab we've been here before! - Don Till 22:22:14 03/2/10 (5)

RE: Now Morricab we've been here before! - morricab 02:00:36 03/5/10 (4)

No I don't think I must... - Don Till 07:19:20 03/5/10 (3)

RE: No I don't think I must... - morricab 05:05:26 03/8/10 (2)

RE: No I don't think I must... - Don Till 06:29:23 03/8/10 (1)

RE: No I don't think I must... - morricab 06:37:17 03/10/10 (0)

It's a binary thing - Presto 11:02:03 02/23/10 (0)

Simply but beautifully put. - Presto 23:35:26 02/21/10 (6)

RE: Simply but beautifully put. - rick_m 09:02:43 02/22/10 (5)

RE: Simply but beautifully put. - morricab 03:48:03 02/23/10 (4)

RE: Simply but beautifully put. - Presto 10:44:47 02/23/10 (3)

RE: Simply but beautifully put. - rick_m 06:59:47 02/24/10 (2)

RE: Simply but beautifully put. - morricab 09:10:26 02/24/10 (1)

RE: Simply but beautifully put. - rick_m 16:44:43 02/24/10 (0)

RE: I think I'll put a nail in this silly recording quality myth once and for all! - thetubeguy1954 16:57:15 02/20/10 (1)

RE: I think I'll put a nail in this silly recording quality myth once and for all! - Tony Lauck 20:14:24 02/20/10 (0)

RE: I think I'll put a nail in this silly recording quality myth once and for all! (long) - Presto 09:34:18 02/20/10 (3)

Nice but... - Don Till 20:54:56 02/22/10 (0)

I will second that! - morricab 03:04:45 02/22/10 (0)

Makes perfect sense to me! nt - Tony Lauck 11:35:05 02/20/10 (0)

I don't see how your taste in female singers has anything to do with recording quality. - Norm 08:52:44 02/20/10 (2)

No recording quality is not a subjective evaluation is it? - Don Till 20:58:27 02/22/10 (1)

RE: No recording quality is not a subjective evaluation is it? - ahendler 06:21:40 02/23/10 (0)

I'm admittedly a poor excuse for an audiophile - kerr 06:51:00 02/20/10 (6)

Your subject line made me think of new expression, that could hopefully catch on: - carcass93 08:23:15 02/22/10 (1)

RE: Your subject line made me think of new expression, that could hopefully catch on: - kerr 13:16:39 02/22/10 (0)

RE: I'm admittedly a poor excuse for an audiophile - Don Till 07:29:15 02/20/10 (3)

RE: I'm admittedly a poor excuse for an audiophile - kerr 08:51:15 02/20/10 (2)

Music lover, audiophile and engineer - Tony Lauck 12:19:28 02/20/10 (1)

RE: Music lover, audiophile and engineer - kerr 13:12:26 02/22/10 (0)

I Have One Patty Griffin CD......... - Todd Krieger 19:04:18 02/19/10 (5)

RE: I Have One Patty Griffin CD......... - Don Till 05:45:08 02/20/10 (4)

RE: I Have One Patty Griffin CD......... - Todd Krieger 18:40:48 02/22/10 (2)

Whatever! - Don Till 21:06:17 02/22/10 (1)

RE: Whatever! - Todd Krieger 23:19:36 02/22/10 (0)

RE: I Have One Patty Griffin CD......... - jult52 11:35:45 02/22/10 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Analog Scott 02/27/1006:28:42 02/27/10 (9)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Don Till 08:07:58 02/27/10 (8)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Analog Scott 08:40:47 02/27/10 (7)

RE: Clearly you can't break down your subjective analysis into different elements so... - Don Till 08:56:02 02/27/10 (6)

Now let's go full circle - Analog Scott 10:23:17 02/27/10 (5)

And your point is? - Don Till 19:43:06 03/2/10 (3)

I think my point was clear - Analog Scott 20:48:51 03/3/10 (2)

Sure as a point it was clear too bad it has no relevance to the topic at hand! - Don Till 07:24:14 03/4/10 (1)

you are correct, other than directly addressing your assertion it was pretty irrelevant. nt - Analog Scott 13:06:24 03/4/10 (0)

RE: Now let's go full circle - morricab 01:03:04 02/28/10 (0)

Post a Message!