In Reply to: I'm not surprised! posted by Don Till on February 26, 2010 at 15:22:51:
Of course when one says "bad sound = bad system" he is going to touch a nerve with this crowd.
We're still waiting for any semblance of substantiation. Cite the posts that support your assertion.
...was what you implied in your previous response.
Are you kidding? Again, provide evidence . Cite the words I said that led you to that conclusion.
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- So who says - E-Stat 02/26/1015:28:34 02/26/10 (12)
- RE: So who says - Don Till 04:49:06 02/27/10 (11)
- Apparently, you have difficulty understanding - E-Stat 06:44:53 02/27/10 (10)
- LOL! - Don Till 08:25:55 02/27/10 (9)
- "there's at least 1/2 dozen references to poor recording quality meaning bad sound." - E-Stat 08:58:15 02/27/10 (8)
- Here is more than 1/2 dozen and there are even more though.. - Don Till 19:23:21 03/2/10 (7)
- You've been posturing so long - E-Stat 05:49:47 03/3/10 (6)
- Without your legalistic posturing it's obvious you still don't get the point! - Don Till 07:01:51 03/3/10 (5)
- RE: Without your legalistic posturing it's obvious you still don't get the point! - morricab 01:54:28 03/5/10 (0)
- "sound bad because what was recorded actually sounds bad." - E-Stat 07:50:17 03/3/10 (3)
- RE: "sound bad because what was recorded actually sounds bad." - Don Till 08:26:19 03/3/10 (2)
- It all boils down to what you consider bad - E-Stat 09:01:36 03/3/10 (1)
- Bingo! - Don Till 20:56:28 03/10/10 (0)