In Reply to: Why? posted by E-Stat on February 24, 2010 at 18:32:52:
"We don't."
Speak for yourself - there's endless evidence indicating that many audiophiles blame bad sound on their recordings. Ie. good recording quality = good sound and bad recording quality = bad sound.
You can see it here in spades with the disagreement with my comments but if you take the time to search on the words "poop" and "shit" and "crap" you can see it in the other forums going back to day one.
Well I consider myself an audiophile though at times it's embarrassing to do so and the definition of a myth is
1.a traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis offact or a natural explanation, esp. one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenonof nature.
2.stories or matter of this kind: realm of myth.
3.any invented story, idea, or concept: His account of the event is pure myth.
4.an imaginary or fictitious thing or person.
5.an unproved or false collective belief that is used to justify a social institution.
As an audiophile I dismiss as a myth the following - Ie. good recording quality = good sound and bad recording quality = bad sound.
Pure and simple it's a myth! And again I am an audiophile.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why? - Don Till 02/24/1019:27:22 02/24/10 (8)
- RE: Why? - morricab 02:23:33 02/25/10 (3)
- Why do you continue on to insist? - Don Till 05:19:36 02/27/10 (2)
- RE: Why do you continue on to insist? - morricab 01:10:33 02/28/10 (1)
- RE: Why do you continue on to insist? - Analog Scott 06:24:48 02/28/10 (0)
- Whatever - E-Stat 19:42:12 02/24/10 (3)
- RE: Whatever - Don Till 19:55:53 02/24/10 (2)
- Let me explain - E-Stat 20:03:35 02/24/10 (1)
- RE: Let me explain - Don Till 08:38:19 02/27/10 (0)