In Reply to: RE: I Shouldn't Comment, But......... posted by theaudiohobby on May 17, 2009 at 10:43:06:
Are you using this Hydrogen thread as your proof of this statement? I ask since there appears to be many logical holes in the argument, some of which are even brought up in the thread, which are never adequately addressed.
For example: Using 50um groove width and dividing it by 2^16 gives 762pm per step to achieve redbook resolution. However since the largest element used to make vinyl is primarily Chlorine which is generally accepted to be smaller than about 100pm. Presuming the vinyl molecules may be cut by the record cutting head and of course that the cutting head control is up to the task this implies that vinyl could in fact be more resolving than redbook. Am I missing something?
One might argue that based on crunching the numbers as I did with 16 bit that 24 bit beats vinyl. Since there is no such thing as any analog systems truly achiving 24 bit capture or playback that would yield a false conclusion as well. In my experience 20 bits is doing quite well which would imply that 24 bit aka 20 bit could just barely beat the resolution of vinyl.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Ugly 05/19/0910:54:02 05/19/09 (30)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - theaudiohobby 13:44:36 05/19/09 (5)
- huh? - Analog Scott 09:36:00 05/22/09 (0)
- Try it this way - Don Till 14:44:56 05/19/09 (0)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Ugly 14:24:08 05/19/09 (2)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - theaudiohobby 15:02:11 05/19/09 (1)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Ugly 15:37:24 05/19/09 (0)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Tony Lauck 13:15:44 05/19/09 (5)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Ugly 14:08:25 05/19/09 (4)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Tony Lauck 18:01:37 05/19/09 (3)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Ugly 18:36:44 05/19/09 (2)
- LP S/N ratio - mls-stl 20:09:42 05/19/09 (0)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Tony Lauck 19:20:13 05/19/09 (0)
- RE: "it is not a belief, it is an indisputable fact that digital has superior resolution to vinyl." - Todd Krieger 12:09:15 05/19/09 (0)
- As I understand, there's no cutting for records themselves - metal "master" is cut,... - carcass93 11:14:25 05/19/09 (16)
- RE: As I understand, there's no cutting for records themselves - metal "master" is cut,... - Ugly 11:35:33 05/19/09 (15)
- vinyl LP production - mls-stl 14:26:40 05/19/09 (6)
- Now yer talkin. Except about how to quantify... - Ugly 14:37:09 05/19/09 (5)
- argument? - mls-stl 14:55:42 05/19/09 (4)
- It could be. - Ugly 15:54:33 05/19/09 (3)
- apples and oranges - mls-stl 17:02:35 05/19/09 (2)
- RE: apples and oranges - Ugly 18:06:02 05/19/09 (1)
- I had no horse in this race - mls-stl 19:06:10 05/19/09 (0)
- RE: As I understand, there's no cutting for records themselves - metal "master" is cut,... - theaudiohobby 14:09:07 05/19/09 (7)
- RE: Not so fast there mister. - Ugly 14:29:53 05/19/09 (6)
- RE: Not so fast there mister. - theaudiohobby 15:09:26 05/19/09 (5)
- RE: Not so fast there mister. - Ugly 15:41:33 05/19/09 (2)
- RE: Not so fast there mister. - theaudiohobby 16:48:05 05/19/09 (1)
- RE: Not so fast there mister. - Ugly 17:35:33 05/19/09 (0)
- Yea and we can store the energy released..... - Don Till 15:15:23 05/19/09 (1)
- RE: Yea and we can store the energy released..... - Ugly 15:48:58 05/19/09 (0)