In Reply to: Are you totally without humor? posted by Pat D on April 23, 2009 at 07:18:50:
so why would I assume you were trying to be now?
"That one is a joke. Only you could fail to notice that--well, may Tom might miss it."
Now THAT's funny. Nice ad hominem!
"Your definition of an ad hominem argument is acceptable."
Phew. That's a relief.
"I should point out that you are ignoring Richard's other arguments, which are not ad hominem but relate to how the sound acts in a room."
I addressed a major part of his post, about ABX tests, which I have an interest in. Just because I find RBNG's position on testing and proofs to be ridiculous doesn't mean I do not appreciate his knowledge of acoustics particularly when it comes to the lower ferequencies.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You've never been humorous before (on purpose), - robert young 04/23/0907:31:19 04/23/09 (2)
- RE: You've never been humorous before (on purpose), - Pat D 08:38:59 04/24/09 (1)
- Please pay attention Pat. - robert young 08:54:45 04/24/09 (0)