In Reply to: Robert Shemp Young? posted by Richard BassNut Greene on April 14, 2009 at 09:53:24:
you sling out plenty of your own.
Suggesting that I would have anything to do with blind tests just shows how far off the mark you are (even if you are trying, tragically, to be funny.) I think blind tests are useless, except as entertainment, and I feel that way no matter on what "side" the results fall. I would wager good cash that I am far more objective about audio, and far more skeptical in general than most of those you buddy up with (and maybe even than you).
You can't see that, though, because you equate my critiques of your faulty logic and bad science as an endorsement of some opposite but equaly foolish position.
Just for giggles, RBNG, how about you find a coupe of amps that you know sound different (say, an Arcam vs. a Conrad -Johnson) and see how you do in a "properly" applied blind test. What would you say if you couldn't tell them apart?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- For a guy who whines incessantly about ad hominems... - robert young 04/14/0910:17:24 04/14/09 (8)
- "how about you find a coupe of amps that you know sound different (say, an Arcam vs. a Conrad -Johnson)" - Richard BassNut Greene 09:24:05 04/16/09 (7)
- RE: "how about you find a coupe of amps that you know sound different (say, an Arcam vs. a Conrad -Johnson)" - robert young 14:22:33 04/20/09 (6)
- I don't think you understand what an ad hominem argument is. - Pat D 08:26:51 04/22/09 (5)
- Here's the definition I use (is your's different?) - robert young 08:32:51 04/22/09 (4)
- Are you totally without humor? - Pat D 07:18:50 04/23/09 (3)
- You've never been humorous before (on purpose), - robert young 07:31:19 04/23/09 (2)
- RE: You've never been humorous before (on purpose), - Pat D 08:38:59 04/24/09 (1)
- Please pay attention Pat. - robert young 08:54:45 04/24/09 (0)