Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

RE: Fine.

Your agenda is clear, to debunk anyone who thinks phase audibility with music is real and to defame JA for making an erroneous statement.

One question for you though since I don't have the Lipshitz paper: Does Lipshitz in his paper actually break down the results and separate test tones from music? Or does he lump all the results together to get the 99% confidence limit? Are his conclusions separated between tones and music or is that your own doing? In other words, are you putting forward their conclusions of the work or your own interpretation of the results??

I have plenty of my own experiments with phase effects while designing speakers to prove that it is real. Using a digital xover with readily adjustable phase allows for some interesting and highly audible results. You should try these things yourself and find out what is audible and what is not. I recommend a Behringer DCX 2496, its cheap and very flexible because you can also do long time delays as well.

"Playing a policeman": One poster got already banned and had his account deleted a few days ago for pointing out this very same "error" of Atkinson's."

Look, its not the pointing out of the error, its the insistence that it was a malicious error intended to mislead readers. You are being intentionally obtuse and trying obfuscate the situation by claiming otherwise. This tells me you are not playing "on the level" and have an agenda to promote.

I don't think it was intentional and most others don't either. It is slanderous to accuse someone of something like that without at least some proof of how it was intentional. That is why TSP was asked to recant or be banned not for pointing out an error. Your way of twisting the reality reminds me of few other chumps here.

"Who are the policement? Those who post the facts for everyone to see, or those who go about deleting them where they become inconvenient and eliminate those who post them? Keep watching what happens to people like him"

Should I just call you Teflon man? Rather than addressing the issue headon you deflect it to the moderators who, BTW could care less about whether JA made a mistake or not but they care very much about slanderous remarks...and rightly so. TSP got what was coming to him for making comments without substantiation and you do too.

" Atkinson himself has suggested that any errors of fact in Stereophile be forwarded to his attention so he can issue a public correction of them. I have done this as suggested. Look at the reactions, including your own. The public may draw its own conclusions.
"

Did you issue them in private first? Give him a chance to address you personally and make the correction? If not then you were just baiting him in a public forum...not cool.

"If you want to discuss that paper I referred to, start another thread and I'll say what I think of it. This thread is about something else.
"

What a copout!! YOU posted that link in THIS thread! So why should I have to start an new thread for you to address it? If you introduced it you should be prepared to discuss it.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  The Cable Cooker  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.